Product and process innovation patterns in Polish low and high technology systems
Abstract
Research background: While the Sectoral Innovation System (SSI) anticipates technology-related similarities in innovation patterns in the same sectors across countries, the distance to the frontier suggests that there are important differences with respect to the level of national technological development. Most contemporary analyses of sectoral innovation systems are focused on well-developed economies. In contrast, the evidence from developing countries including new EU members are scared and lack dynamics.
Purpose of the article: The purpose of this paper is to identify and compare product and process innovation patterns in Polish low and high technology systems. The main assumption is that divergence and convergence in innovation patterns of low- and medium-low technology (LMT) and high technology (HT) systems evolve over time and are strongly influenced by the characteristics of firms, their linkages with other system participants, existing demand, and institutional conditions.
Methods: According to the third edition of the Oslo Manual (OECD, 2005), we employ a harmonized questionnaire and methodology to collect unique micro data on innovation. The survey concerns 5252 firms including 873 firms from HT sector. The scope of the research relates to product and process innovation at least new to the firm.
Findings & value added: Our results show that although the intensity of product and process innovation is higher in HT system, both business support institutions and public financial instruments better support firms in LMT sectors. On the other hand, existing demand and market structure favor the emergence of new innovations at the firm level (imitations), but with more emphasis on LMT. The key source of innovation is suppliers, with foreign suppliers in HT and national ones in LMT. In contrast to leading economies, LMT plays a key role in long term economic growth in Poland.
Keywords
innovation, LMT, HT, system, technology
References
- Alhusen, H., Bennat, T., Bizer, K., Cantner, U., Horstmann, E., Kalthaus, M., Proeger, T., Sternberg, R., & Töpfer, S. (2021). A new measurement concep-tion for the ?doing-using-interacting? mode of innovation. Research Policy, 50(4), 104?114. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104214
View in Google Scholar - Andersson, S., Evers, N., & Kuivalainen, O. (2014). International new ventures: rapid internationalization across different industry contexts. European Busi-ness Review, 26(5), 390?405. doi:10.1108/EBR-05-2014-0040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-05-2014-0040
View in Google Scholar - Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 151?173. doi: 10.2307/2295952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2295952
View in Google Scholar - Bennat, T. (2022). High innovativeness of SMEs and the configuration of learn-ing-by-doing, learning-by-using, learning-by-interacting, and learning-by-science: a regional comparison applying fuzzy qualitative comparative analy-sis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2), 1666?1691. doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-0077 4-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00774-1
View in Google Scholar - Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61?74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
View in Google Scholar - Caerteling, J. S., Halman, J. I. M., Song, M., & Dorée, A. G. (2009). Impact of government and corporate strategy on the performance of technology projects in road construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1211?1221. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000089
View in Google Scholar - Candi, M., Ende, J., & Gemser, G. (2016). Benefits of customer codevelopment of new products: the moderating effects of utilitarian and hedonic radicalness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(4), 418?434. doi: 10.1111/jpim .12286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12286
View in Google Scholar - Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68?82. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
View in Google Scholar - Castellacci, F. (2008). Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: manu-facturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of in-novation. Research Policy, 37(6), 978?994. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.011
View in Google Scholar - Cattani, G., & Malerba, F. (2021). Evolutionary approaches to innovation, the firm, and the dynamics of industries. Strategy Science, 6(4), 265?289. doi: 10.1287/s tsc.2021.0141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2021.0141
View in Google Scholar - Chamberlin, T., & Doutriaux, J. (2010). Sourcing knowledge and innovation in a low-technology industry. Industry and Innovation, 17(5), 487?510. doi: 10.10 80/13662711003633413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662711003633413
View in Google Scholar - Chen, L. C. (2009). Learning through informal local and global linkages: the case of Taiwan?s machine tool industry. Research Policy, 38(3), 527?535. doi: 10.10 16/j.respol.2008.10.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.008
View in Google Scholar - Choi, J., & Lee, J. (2018) Firm size and compositions of R&D expenditures: evi-dence from a panel of R&D performing manufacturing firms. Industry and Innovation, 25(5), 459?481. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2017.1297222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1297222
View in Google Scholar - Chung, S. (Andy), & Kim, G. M. (2003). Performance effects of partnership be-tween manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: the suppli-er?s standpoint. Research Policy, 32(4), 587?603. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00 047-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00047-1
View in Google Scholar - Cohen, W. M., & Levin, R. C. (1989). Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (Eds.). Handbook of industrial or-ganization (pp. 1059?1107). Netherlands: North-Holland. doi: 10.1016/S1573-448 X(89)02006-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-448X(89)02006-6
View in Google Scholar - Connolly, M. (2003). The dual nature of trade: measuring its impact on imitation and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 31?55. doi: 10.1016/S0 304-3878(03)00067-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00067-1
View in Google Scholar - Cui, A., & Wu, F. (2015). Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: anteced-ents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. Jour-nal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 516?538. doi: 10.1007/s11747-015-0433-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0433-x
View in Google Scholar - Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (2010). Technical change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.). Handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 51?127). Netherlands: North-Holland. doi: 10.10 16/S0169-7218(10)01003-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01003-8
View in Google Scholar - Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120?1171.
View in Google Scholar - Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation approaches?their emergence and characteristics. In C. Edquist (Eds.). Systems of innovation: technologies, in-stitutions and organizations (pp. 1?63). London: Pinter Publishers.
View in Google Scholar - Fassio, C. (2015). How similar is innovation in German, Italian and Spanish me-dium-technology sectors? Implications for the sectoral systems of innovation and distance-to-the-frontier perspectives. Industry and Innovation, 22(2), 102?125. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2015.1033160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2015.1033160
View in Google Scholar - Fontana, R., Martinelli, A., & Nuvolari, A. (2021). Regimes reloaded! A reap-praisal of Schumpeterian patterns of innovation, 1977?2011. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 31(5), 1495?1519. doi: 10.1007/s00191-021-00735-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-021-00735-6
View in Google Scholar - Freel, M. S. (2003). Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Research Policy, 32(5), 751?770. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00 084-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00084-7
View in Google Scholar - Frenz, M., & Lambert, R. (2009). Exploring non-technological and mixed modes of innovation across countries. In Innovation in firms: a microeconomic per-spective. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264056213-4-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056213-4-en
View in Google Scholar - Galindo-Rueda, F., & Verger, F. (2016). OECD taxonomy of economic activities based on R&D intensity. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2016/04. doi: 10.1787/5jlv73sqqp8r-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlv73sqqp8r-en
View in Google Scholar - Grimpe, C., & Sofka, W. (2009). Search patterns and absorptive capacity: low- and high-technology sectors in European countries. Research Policy, 38(3), 495?506. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.006
View in Google Scholar - Hansen, U. E., & Lema, R. (2019). The co-evolution of learning mechanisms and technological capabilities: lessons from energy technologies in emerging economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 241?257. doi: 10.1 016/j.techfore.2018.12.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.007
View in Google Scholar - Hauknes, J., & Knell, M. (2009). Embodied knowledge and sectoral linkages: an input?output approach to the interaction of high- and low-tech industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 459?469. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.012
View in Google Scholar - Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Albors Garrigos, J., & Gil-Pechuan, I. (2011). Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: a forgotten lesson for policymakers. Technovation, 31(9), 427?446. doi: 10.1016 /j.technovation.2011.06.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.06.006
View in Google Scholar - Hirsch?Kreinsen, H. (2008). ?Low?Tech? innovations. Industry and Innovation, 15(1), 19?43. doi: 10.1080/13662710701850691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710701850691
View in Google Scholar - Hirsch?Kreinsen, H., Jacobson, D., & Robertson, P. L. (2006). ?Low?tech? indus-tries: innovativeness and development perspectives?a summary of a Europe-an research project. Prometheus, 24(1), 3?21. doi: 10.1080/08109020600563762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08109020600563762
View in Google Scholar - Huang, C., Arundel, A., & Hollanders, H. (2010). How firms innovate: R&D, non-R&D, and technology adoption. UNU-MERIT Working Papers.
View in Google Scholar - Johnsen, T. E. (2009). Supplier involvement in new product development and innovation: taking stock and looking to the future. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 15(3), 187?197. doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2009.03.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2009.03.008
View in Google Scholar - Kastelli, I., Tsakanikas, A., & Caloghirou, Y. (2018). Technology transfer as a mechanism for dynamic transformation in the food sector. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(4), 882?900. doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9530-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9530-3
View in Google Scholar - Kirner, E., Kinkel, S., & Jaeger, A. (2009). Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms?an empirical analysis of German in-dustry. Research Policy, 38(3), 447?458. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.011
View in Google Scholar - Klepper, S. (1996). Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 86(3), 562?583.
View in Google Scholar - Klepper, S. (1997). Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1). 145?182. doi: 10.1093/icc/6.1.145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/6.1.145
View in Google Scholar - Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportu-nities. Research Policy, 24(2), 185?205. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I
View in Google Scholar - Kuen-Hung, T., & Wang, J.-C. (2009). External technology sourcing and innova-tion performance in LMT sectors: an analysis based on the Taiwanese techno-logical innovation survey. Research Policy, 38(3), 518?526. doi: 10.1016/j.re spol.2008.10.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.007
View in Google Scholar - Leiponen, A., & Drejer, I. (2007). What exactly are technological regimes? Intra-industry heterogeneity in the organization of innovation activities. Research Policy, 36(8), 1221?1238. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.008
View in Google Scholar - Lemeshow, S., Sturdivant, R. X., & Hosmer Jr, D. W. (2013). Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat06902
View in Google Scholar - Liang, J., & Goetz, S. J. (2018). Technology intensity and agglomeration econo-mies. Research Policy, 47(10), 1990?1995. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.006
View in Google Scholar - Lundvall, B. A. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg & L. G. Soete (Eds.). Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349?369). London: Pinter Publishing.
View in Google Scholar - Lundvall, B., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23?42. doi: 10.1080/13662719400000002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719400000002
View in Google Scholar - Malerba, F. (1992). Learning by firms and incremental technical change. Economic Journal, 102(413), 845?859. doi: 10.2307/2234581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2234581
View in Google Scholar - Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247?264. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
View in Google Scholar - Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation: concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493270
View in Google Scholar - Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking in-novation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(1?2), 63?82. doi: 10.1080/1043859042000 228688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000228688
View in Google Scholar - Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1997). Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 83?118. doi: 10.1 093/icc/6.1.83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/6.1.83
View in Google Scholar - Mattes, K., Zanker, C., & Som, O. (2015). Managing innovation in non-R&D intensive firms. In O. Som, & E. Kirner (Eds.). Low-tech innovation: competi-tiveness of the German manufacturing sector (pp. 165?197). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-09973-6_10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09973-6_10
View in Google Scholar - McKelvey, M., & Ljungberg, D. (2017). How public policy can stimulate the capabilities of firms to innovate in a traditional industry through academic engagement: the case of the Swedish food industry. R&D Management, 47(4), 534?544. doi: 10.1111/radm.12224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12224
View in Google Scholar - Mendonça, S. (2009). Brave old world: accounting for ?high-tech? knowledge in ?low-tech? industries. Research Policy, 38(3). 470?482, doi: 10.1016/j.respol .2008.10.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.018
View in Google Scholar - Mu?oz, C., Galvez, D., Enjolras, M., Camargo, M., & Alfaro, M. (2022). Rela-tionship between innovation and exports in enterprises: a support tool for syn-ergistic improvement plans. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, 121489. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121489
View in Google Scholar - Nelson, R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
View in Google Scholar - Nowiński, W., & Rialp, A. (2013). Drivers and strategies of international new ventures from a Central European transition economy. Journal for East European Management Studies, 18(2), 191?231. doi: 10.5771/0949-6181-2013 -2-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2013-2-191
View in Google Scholar - Nouman, M., Yunis, M. S., Atiq, M., Mufti, O., & Qadus, A. (2022). The forgot-ten sector?: an integrative framework for future research on low- and medium-technology innovation. Sustainability, 14(6), 3572. doi: 10.3390/su14063572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063572
View in Google Scholar - OECD (2005). Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris and Luxembourg: OECD/Euro-stat. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en
View in Google Scholar - Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343?373. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
View in Google Scholar - Pavitt, K., Robson, M., & Townsend, J. (1987). The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK: 1945-1983. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(3), 297?313. doi: 10.2307/2098636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2098636
View in Google Scholar - Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Network-ing and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5?6(3?4), 137?168. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004. 00101.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x
View in Google Scholar - Radicic, D., & Pinto, J. (2019). Collaboration with external organizations and technological innovations: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Sustainability, 11(9), 2479. doi: 10.3390/su11092479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092479
View in Google Scholar - Reichert, F. M., Torugsa, N. (Ann), Zawislak, P. A., & Arundel, A. (2016). Ex-ploring innovation success recipes in low-technology firms using fuzzy-set QCA. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5437?5441. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016. 04.151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.151
View in Google Scholar - Robertson, P. L., & Patel, P. R. (2007). New wine in old bottles: technological diffusion in developed economies. Research Policy, 36(5), 708?721. doi: 10.10 16/j.respol.2007.01.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.008
View in Google Scholar - Robertson, P. L., Pol, E., & Carroll, P. (2003). Receptive capacity of established industries as a limiting factor in the economy?s rate of innovation. Industry and Innovation, 10(4), 457?474. doi: 10.1080/1366271032000163685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1366271032000163685
View in Google Scholar - Robertson, P., Smith, K., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2009). Innovation in low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 441?446. doi: 10.1016/ j.respol.2008.10.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.019
View in Google Scholar - Roger, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New Jork: The Free Press.
View in Google Scholar - Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box: technology and economics. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611940
View in Google Scholar - Sakka, O., St-Pierre, J., & Bahri, M. (2019). Innovation collaborations in low-to-medium tech SMEs: the role of the firm? innovation orientation and use of ex-ternal information. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(02), 1950011. doi: 10.1142/S1363919619500117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500117
View in Google Scholar - Santamaría, L., Nieto, M. J., & Barge-Gil, A. (2009). Beyond formal R&D: taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology in-dustries. Research Policy, 38(3), 507?517. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.004
View in Google Scholar - Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. New York: Harvard Uni-versity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674432833
View in Google Scholar - Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
View in Google Scholar - Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New Jork: Har-per and Bros.
View in Google Scholar - Segarra-Ciprés, M., Bou-Llusar, J. C., & Roca-Puig, V. (2012). Exploring and exploiting external knowledge: the effect of sector and firm technological in-tensity. Innovation, 14(2), 203?217. doi: 10.5172/impp.2012.14.2.203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2012.14.2.203
View in Google Scholar - Thornhill, S. (2006). Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 687?703. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.001
View in Google Scholar - Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2017). An examination of product innovation in low- and medium-technology industries: cases from the UK packaged food sector. Research Policy, 46(3), 605?623. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.007
View in Google Scholar - von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New Jork: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar - von Hippel, E. (2007). Horizontal innovation networks - by and for users. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 293?315. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtm005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm005
View in Google Scholar - Wang, C., Rodan, S., Fruin, M., & Xu, X. (2014). Knowledge networks, collabora-tion networks, and exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 484?514. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0917
View in Google Scholar - Winter, S. G. (1984). Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 5(3), 287?320. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(84)90004-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(84)90004-0
View in Google Scholar - Wu, A., & Wang, C. C. (2017). Knowledge search pattern and product innovation of firms in low and high-technology industrial clusters: a knowledge related-ness perspective. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 108(4), 488?502. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12226
View in Google Scholar - Zheng, G., Guo, Y., & Wang, Y. (2016). Non-R&D innovation patterns in Chinese SMEs: an empirical study from Zhejiang Province. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 13(6), 1640014. doi: 10.1142/S0219 877016400149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877016400149
View in Google Scholar