Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Impact of cooperation flexibility on innovation flexibility in SMEs

Abstract

Research background: Flexibility has become a possible means for manufacturing companies to better compete in competitive markets. Furthermore, innovations are perceived as an important factor in company strategy, which can differentiate the company from the competition.

Purpose of the article: This present study investigates the problems of cooperation flexibility and innovation flexibility in manufacturing companies among electrical engineering companies in the Czech Republic. The aim of this paper is to identify the impact of cooperation flexibility on innovation flexibility in small and medium-sized manufacturing companies.

Methods: A questionnaire addressed to SMEs in the form of the Likert scale was prepared to gather information about cooperation flexibility and innovation flexibility. All parts of the questionnaire were tested using Cronbach Alpha. Spearman correlation and regression analysis were used for analysis.

Findings & value added: The results of the research show that external cooperation flexibility and internal cooperation flexibility is related to innovation flexibility in SMEs. Results of the research show that there is a positive relationship 1) between external cooperation flexibility and innovation flexibility and 2) between innovation flexibility and business performance at SMEs. The findings of the research contribute to an understanding of the relationship between cooperation flexibility, innovation flexibility and also innovation performance. The novelty value of this paper lies in its perception of flexibility as having two parts, namely external (with suppliers and customers) and internal cooperation flexibility. In addition, innovation flexibility was investigated in two fields, product, and accompanying services to products. The view mentioned provides a complex view of flexibility.

Keywords

cooperation flexibility, innovation flexibility, electrical engineering companies, high-tech manufacturers, SMEs

PDF

References

  1. Beraha, A., Bingol, D., Ozkan-Canbolat, E., & Szczygiel, N. (2018). The effect of strategic flexibility configurations on product innovation. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 27(2), 129?140. doi: 10.1108/EJMBE-02-2018-0028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-02-2018-0028
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Bhatti, A., Rehman, S. U., & Rumman, J. B. A. (2020). Organizational capabili-ties mediates between organizational culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and organizational performance of SMEs in Pakistan. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 85?103. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2020.080405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080405
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Bjerke, L., & Johansson, S. (2015). Patterns of innovation and collaboration in small and large firms. Annals of Regional Science, 55(1), 221?247. doi: 10.100 7/s00168-015-0712-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0712-y
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Brito, L. A. L., Brito, E. P. Z., & Hashiba, L. H. (2014). What type of cooperation with suppliers and customers leads to superior performance? Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 952?959. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.07.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.07.015
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Brozovic, D. (2018). Strategic flexibility: a review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 3?31. doi:10.2307/2393553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12111
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Carlsson, B. (1996). Innovation and success in Sweden: technological systems. In J. de la Mothe & G. Paquet (Eds). Evolutionary economics and the new inter-national political economy. New York: Pinter.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Christensen, C. M., Bartman, T., & Van Bever, D. (2016). The hard truth about business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 31.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128?152. doi: 10.2307/2393553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Connor, N. O., Lowry, P. B., & Treiblmaier, H. (2020). Interorganizational coop-eration and supplier performance in high-technology supply chains. Heliyon, 6(3), e03434. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03434
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Dabrowski, D. (2019). The technological advancement of new products, product newness and market information. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 22(3), 168?185. doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2019-3-011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2019-3-011
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Dai, Y., Goodale, J. C., Byun, G., & Ding, F. (2018). Strategic flexibility in new high?technology ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 55(2), 265?294. doi: 10.1111/joms.12288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12288
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Das, K. (2011). Integrating effective flexibility measures into a strategic supply chain planning model. European Journal of Operational Research, 211(1), 170?183. doi:10.2307/2393553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.12.006
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Delic, M., & Eyers, D.R. (2020). The effect of additive manufacturing adoption on supply chain flexibility and performance: an empirical analysis from the automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 228, 107689. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107689
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Di Sivo, M., & Cellucci, C. (2013). Flexibility and cooperation: the characteris-tics of low cost home. In S. Yazdani & A. Singh (Eds.). New developments in structural engineering and construction. Research Publishing Services. doi: 10.385 0/978-981-07-5354-2_H-2-128.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Fan, Z., Wu, D., & Wu, X. (2013). Proactive and reactive strategic flexibility in coping with environmental change in innovation. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(2), 187?201. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2013.866316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2013.866316
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Faroque, A. R., Morrish, S. C., & Ferdous, A. S. (2017). Networking, business process innovativeness and export performance: the case of South Asian low-tech industry. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(6), 864?875. doi: 10.1108/jbim-06-2015-0113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-06-2015-0113
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Faems, D., Van Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2005). Interorganizational collabora-tion and innovation: toward a portfolio approach. Product Innovation Management, 22(3), 238?250. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00120.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00120.x
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Forslund, H., Jonsson, P., & Mattsson, S.-A. (2021). Supplier flexibility in the order-to-delivery process ? a customer perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 51(1), 4?24. doi: 10.1108/IJPD LM-08-2019-0265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2019-0265
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Franco, C., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2014). Absorptive capacity, proximi-ty in cooperation and integration mechanisms, empirical evidence from CIS data. Industry and Innovation, 21(4), 332?357. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2014.942083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2014.942083
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Gaviria-Marin, M., Matute-Vallejo, J., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2021). The effect of ICT and higher-order capabilities on the performance of Ibero-American SMEs. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 27, 414?450. doi: 10.1007/s10588-021-09333-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-021-09333-0
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Grubic, T., & Peppard, J. (2016). Servitized manufacturing firms competing through remote monitoring technology. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(2), 154?184. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-05-2014-0061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2014-0061
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Ivanov, D., Das, A., & Choi, T. M. (2018). New flexibility drivers for manufactur-ing, supply chain and service operations. International Journal of Production Research, 56, 3359?3368. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1457813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1457813
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Ionescu, L. (2021). Corporate environmental performance, climate change mitiga-tion, and green innovation behaviour in sustainable finance. Economics, Man-agement, and Financial Markets, 16(3), 94?106. doi: 10.22381/emfm163202 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22381/emfm16320216
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Hanna, V., & Walsh, K. (2002). Small firm networks: a successful approach to innovation? R&D Management, 32(3), 201?207. doi: 10.1111/1467-9310.002 53.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Heide, J., & Miner, A. (1992). The shadow of the future: effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact in buyer?seller cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 265?291. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-05-2014-0061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256374
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Jain, A., Jain, P. K., Chan, F. T., & Singh, S. (2013). A review on manufacturing flexibility. International Journal of Production Research, 51(19), 5946?5970. doi: 10.2307/2393553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.824627
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Jin, S., & Choi, S. (2019). The effect of innovation capability on business perfor-mance: a focus on IT and business service companies. Sustainability, 11, 5246. doi: 10.3390/su11195246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195246
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Johnston, D., McCutcheon, D., Stuart, F., & Kerwood, H. (2004). Effects of sup-plier trust on performance of cooperative supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 22(1), 23?38. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.001
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Jong, G. D., & Woolthuis, R. K. (2008). The institutional arrangements of innova-tion: antecedents and performance effects of trust in high?tech alliances. Industry and Innovation, 15(1), 45?67. doi: 10.1080/13662710701858520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710701858520
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Kamasak, R., Yavuz, M., Karagulle, A. O., & Agca, T. (2016). Importance of strategic flexibility on the knowledge and innovation relationship: an emerg-ing market study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 126?132. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.121
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Kaňovská, L., & Tomášková, E. (2018). Drivers for smart servitization in manu-facturing companies. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 3, 57?68. doi: 10.7160/aol.2018.100305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2018.100305
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Kaschel, H., & Sánchez y Bernal, L. M. (2006). Importance of flexibility in manu-facturing systems. International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control, 1(2), 53?60. doi: 10.15837/ijccc.2006.2.2285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2006.2.2285
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Kovacova, M., & Lăzăroiu, G. (2021). Sustainable organizational performance, cyber-physical production networks, and deep learning-assisted smart process planning in Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 16(3), 41?54. doi: 10.22381/emfm16320 212.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Kumar, R. (2013). Efficient customization of software applications of an organi-zation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(11), 36?41. doi: 10.1111/1467-9310.00253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00253
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Kumar, S., Boyal, A., & Singhal, A. (2017). Manufacturing flexibility and its effect on system performance. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 11(2), 105?112.
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Kumar, S., & Sharma, R. K. (2014). An ISM based framework for structural rela-tionship among various manufacturing flexibility dimensions. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 6(4), 11?52. doi: 10.1007/s13198-014-0279-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-014-0279-5
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Kumar, P. & Singh, A.P. (2019). Flexibility in service operations: review, synthe-sis and research agenda. Benchmarking, 27, 2108?2129. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0405
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Kumar, R. L., & Stylianou, A. C. (2014). A process model for analyzing and man-aging flexibility in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(2), 151?184. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2012.53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.53
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Landström, A., Almström, P., Winroth, M., Anders-son, C., Wimmark, C., Shahbazi, S., Wiktorsson, M., Kurdve, M., Zackrisson, M., Ericson Öberg, A., & Myrelid, A. (2016). Present state analysis of business performance meas-urement systems in large manufacturing companies. In Proceedings of the 10th conference of the performance measurement association. Edinburgh: Association (PMA).
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Latifi, M.-A., & Bouwman, H. (2018). Business model innovation and firm per-formance: the role of mediation and moderation factors. In A. Pucihar, M. Kljajić Borštnar, P. Ravesteijn, J. Seitz, & R. Bons (Eds.). Conference pro-ceedings of the 31st Bled eConference digital transformation: meeting the challenges. Maribor: University of Maribor Press. doi: 10.18690/978-961-286-170-4.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-170-4.5
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131?150. doi: 10.1002/smj.507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Li, B. (2015). The effects of new technology flexibility on innovation perfor-mance in the post-implementation age. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(5), 22?27.
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Li, Y., Li, P. P., Wang, H., & Ma, Y. (2017). How do resource structuring and strategic flexibility interact to shape radical innovation? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(4), 471?491. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12389
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Liao, Y., Hong, P., & Rao, S. (2010). Supply management, supply flexibility, and performance outcomes: an empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(3), 6?22. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X .2010.03195.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03195.x
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Liao, Y., & Barnes, J. (2015). Knowledge acquisition and product innovation flexibility in SMEs. Business Process Management Journal, 21(6), 1257?1278. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-05-2014-0039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2014-0039
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Liao, Y. (2020). An integrative framework of supply chain flexibil-ity. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(6), 1321?1342. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-07-2019-0359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2019-0359
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Liu, A. M., & Chan, I. Y. (2017). Understanding the interplay of organizational climate and leadership in construction innovation. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(5), 04017021. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000521
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Lund, R. (1998). Organizational and innovative flexibility mechanisms and their impact upon organizational effectiveness. DRUID Working Paper, 23.
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Martínez-Sánchez, Á., Vela-Jimenez, M. J., Abella-Garces, S., & Gorgemans, S. (2019). Flexibility and innovation: moderator effects of cooperation and dy-namism. Personnel Review, 8(6), 1548?1564. doi: 10.1108/PR-12-2017-0397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2017-0397
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Maditinos, D., Chatzoudes, D., & Sarigiannidis, L. (2014). Factors affecting e-business successful implementation. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 24(4), 300?320. doi: 10.1108/IJCoMA-07-2012-0043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCoMA-07-2012-0043
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Mesquita, I., & Brush, T. (2008). Untangling safeguard and production coordina-tion effects in long-term buyer-supplier relationships. Academy of Manage-ment Journal, 51(4), 785?807. doi: 10.5465/amr.2008.33665612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.33665612
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Nham, T., Nguyen, N., Pham, G., & Nguyen, N. (2016). The effects of innovation on firm performance of supporting industries in Hanoi-Vietnam. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 9(2), 413?431. doi: 10.3926/ji em.1564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1564
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Nordan, E. R., & Tolstoy, D. (2011). Technology innovation in internationalising SMEs. Industry and Innovation, 18(7), 669?684. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2011. 604472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.604472
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Obeidat, B. Y., Al-Suradi, M. M., & Tarhini, A. (2016). The impact of knowledge management on innovation: an empirical study on Jordanian consultancy firms. Management Research Review, 39(10), 1214?1238. doi: 10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0214
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Parast, M. M., & Shekarian, M. (2019). The impact of supply chain disruptions on organizational performance: a literature review. In G. Zsidisin & M. Henke (Eds.). Revisiting supply chain risk. Springer series in supply chain manage-ment, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_21
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Parida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J. (2012). Inbound open innovation activities in high-tech SMEs: the impact on innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283?309. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012 .00354.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00354.x
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Parker, R. (2001). The myth of entrepreneurial economy: employment and inno-vation in small firms. Work, Employment and Society, 15(2), 373?383. doi: 10.11 77/09500170122119002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170122119002
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Pellicelli, M. (2018). Gaining flexibility and innovation through offshore out-sourcing. Sustainability, 10(5), 1672. doi: 10.3390/su10051672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051672
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Pinheiro, J., Lages, L. F., Silva, G. M., Dias, A. L., & Preto, M. T. (2021). Effects of absorptive capacity and innovation spillover on manufacturing flexibil-ity. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. Ad-vance online publication. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-04-2020-0156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2020-0156
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017). From creativity to innovation: the social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53?79. doi: 10.5465/amr.2014.0462.
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Sanchez, R. (1995). Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 135?159. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250160921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160921
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Santoro, G., Ferraris, A., Giacosa, E., & Giovando, E. G. (2016). How SMEs en-gage in open innovation: a survey. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(2), 561?574. doi: 10.1007/s13132-015-0350-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0350-8
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Sass, M., & Vlčková, J. (2019). Just look behind the data! Czech and Hungarian outward foreign direct investment and multinationals. Acta Oeconomia, 69(S2), 73?105. doi: 10.1556/032.2019.69.s2.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2019.69.s2.4
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Scuotto, V., & Shukla, S. (2015). Being innovator or imovator: current dilemma? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9, 212?227. doi: 10.1007/s13132-015-0336-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0336-6
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Scuotto, V., Del Giudice, M., & Carayannis, E. G. (2017). The effect of social networking sites and absorptive capacity on SMES? innovation perfor-mance. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 409?424. doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9517-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9517-0
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017). From creativity to innovation: the social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53?79. doi: 10.5465/amr.2014.0462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0462
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Shahmandy, E., Siong, A. D., & Samah, S. A. (2012). Facilitating global economy process through human resource re-engineering and knowledge management. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(20), 218?223.
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Shukla, S. K. (2020). Evaluating the practices of flexibility maturity for the soft-ware product and service organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 71?89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.005
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Singh, V., & Agrawal, A. (2017). Impact of business environment on balancing innovation process in Indian SMEs. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 12(2), 224?239. doi: 10.1504/IJBIR.2017.081404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2017.10001663
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Smith, A., & Machova, V. (2021). Internet of Things-based decision support sys-tems, industrial big data analytics, and autonomous production processes in sustainable smart manufacturing. Journal of Self-Governance and Manage-ment Economics, 9(4), 21?34. doi: 10.22381/jsme9420212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22381/jsme9420212
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2016). E-business, organiza-tional innovation and firm performance in manufacturing SMEs: an empirical study in Spain. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(6), 885?904. doi: 10.3846/20294913.2015.1074126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1074126
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Stonebraker, P., & Leong, K. (1994). Operations strategy. New York: Prentice Hall.
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Sykes, T. A., Venkatesh, V., & Johnson, J. L. (2014). Enterprise system imple-mentation and employee job performance: understanding the role of advice networks. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 51?72. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.03
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Tomášková, E. (2005). Measuring of market orientation and its impact on public finance. Brno: Vutium.
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Trimi, S. (2008). ICTs for small and medium enterprises. Service Business, 2, 271?273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-008-0042-6
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Todorut, A. V. (2008). Innovation, flexibility, change-premises of organizational development. University Library of Munich, Germany, MPRA Paper.
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Vanhaverbeke, W., Van de Vrande, V., & Chesbrough, H. (2008). Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate ventures in terms of real options. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(4), 251?258. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00499.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00499.x
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Vokurka, R. J., & O'Leary-Kelly, S. W. (2000). A review of empirical research on manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 18(4), 485?501. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00031-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00031-0
    View in Google Scholar
  79. Wall, W. P. (2021). Determinants of SMEs´ performance ? from business strategy to innovation. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 537?554. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.32
    View in Google Scholar
  80. Way, S. A., Tracey, J. B., Fay, C. H., Wright, P. M., Snell, S. A., Chang, S., & Gong, Y. (2015). Validation of a multidimensional HR flexibility meas-ure. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1098?1131. doi: 10.1177/0149206312463 940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312463940
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Wei, Z.. Yi, Y., & Guo, H. (2014). Organizational learning ambidexterity, strate-gic flexibility, and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 832?847. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12126
    View in Google Scholar
  82. Wilson, E., & Nielson, C. (2001). Cooperation and continuity in strategic business relationships. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 8(1), 1?24. doi: 10.1300/J033v08n01_01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J033v08n01_01
    View in Google Scholar
  83. Yam, R. C. M., Lo, W., Tang, E. P. Y., & Lau, K. W. (2010). Technological inno-vation capabilities and ?rm performance. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 42(6), 1009?1017.
    View in Google Scholar
  84. Zadykowicz, A., Chmielewski, K. J. & Siemieniako, D. (2020). Proactive cus-tomer orientation and joint learning capabilities in collaborative machine to machine innovation technology development: the case study of automotive equipment manufacturers. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(3), 531?547. doi: 10.24136 /oc.2020.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.022
    View in Google Scholar
  85. Zhou, K. Z., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 547?561. doi: 10.1 002/smj.830.
    View in Google Scholar
  86. Zinecker, M., Skalicka, M., Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2022). Business angels in the Czech Republic: characteristics and a classification with policy implications. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 273?298. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.1890179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1890179
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 256

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.