Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Asymmetry and convergence in the development of digital technologies in the EU countries

Abstract

Research background: Digitalization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated significantly across Europe, including in regions that are at the stage of catch-up development. However, as innovative technologies are intensively integrated into everyday life, the digital gap between the EU countries is increasing. The widening digital gap is becoming a serious threat to achieving the EU's sustainable development goals and building a sustainable European society.

Purpose of the article: The purpose of the article was to empirically substantiate the inclusiveness and convergence of the digital strategy in the EU countries.

Methods: Using the method of fuzzy sets, the level of asymmetry in access to transactional            (e-commerce), information (cloud computing), operational (artificial intelligence) technologies in the EU countries was assessed. The negative impact of the digital gap within the countries (the gap between small, medium, large companies) and the global digital gap (the gap between EU countries) on the competitiveness of countries was established, for which correlation analysis and the Granger causality test were used.

Findings & value added: The findings of this study contribute to the literature of digital transformation and digital gap of European countries. The impact of the digital gap in transactional, information, operational technologies on the competitiveness of countries is differentiated depending on the level of digitalization of the country. Cluster groups of countries are determined by the convergence of digitalization and ways to ensure long-term competitiveness. The directions for reducing the digital gap in the EU countries are substantiated by changing the priorities of spending on innovation and increasing productivity, diversifying the digital technologies used. The empirical results obtained can serve as a basis for improving the effectiveness of the digitalization policy in the EU countries in accordance with individual convergence goals. The main added value of the paper is related to the presented research procedure, which can be used in analyses of digital technologies development also for other countries. The results provide valuable insights into evaluating the digital technologies in European countries.

Keywords

EU, digitalization, digital gap, digital technologies, convergence, digital strategy, competitiveness

PDF

References

  1. Acılar, A., Koca, G., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2011). Digital divide among enterprises in a developing country. International Journal of Ebusiness and Egovernment Studies, 3, 2.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Adamek, J., & Solarz, M. (2023). Adoption factors in digital lending services offered by FinTech lenders. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 169–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.005
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Akande, A., Cabral, P., & Casteleyn, S. (2019). Assessing the gap between technology and the environmental sustainability of European Cities. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 581–604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09903-3
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Aytekin, A., Ecer, F., Korucuk, S., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2022). Global innovation efficiency assessment of EU member and candidate countries via DEA-EATWIOS multi-criteria methodology. Technology in Society, 68, 101896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101896
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Appiah-Otoo, I., & Song, N. (2021). The impact of ICT on economic growth-comparing rich and poor countries. Telecommunications Policy, 45(1), 102082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102082
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Bickley, S. J., Macintyre, A., & Torgler, B. (2021). Artificial intelligence and big data in sustainable entrepreneurship. CREMA Working Paper Series, 2021b-11.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Bonsón, E., Lavorato, D., Lamboglia, R., & Mancini, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence activities and ethical approaches in leading listed companies in the European Union. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 43, 100535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2021.100535
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Brunet-Thornton, R., Cramer, T., & Jirsák, P. (2019). A research agenda on Czech attitudinal perspectives in an era of digital transformation. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 6(1), 99–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v6i1.277
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Carlsson, V., & Rönnblom, M. (2022). From politics to ethics: Transformations in EU policies on digital technology. Technology in Society, 71, 102145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102145
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Civelek, M., Krajčík, V., & Ključnikov, A. (2023). The impacts of dynamic capabilities on SMEs’ digital transformation process: The resource-based view perspective. Oeconomia Copernicana. Advance online publication. 10.24136/oc.2023.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.019
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Cunningham, C. J. L., Weathington, B. L., & Pittenger, D. J. (2013). Understanding and conducting research in the health sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118643624
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Dondapati, A., Sheoliha, N., Panduro-Ramirez, J., Bakhare, R., Sreejith, P. M., & Devi Prasad Kotni, V. V. (2022). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for knowledge production and B2B marketing rational analysis for enhancing business performance. Materials Today: Proceedings, 56, 4, 2232–2235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.557
    View in Google Scholar
  13. European Commission (2022). Shaping Europe’s digital future. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/connectivity.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Eurostat (2022a). Database. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/ data/database.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Eurostat (2022b). Structural business statistics overview. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Structural_bus iness_statistics_overview.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2018). Studying confgurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 18(3), 482–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018786487
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Gavkalova, N., Kolupaieva, I., & Barka, Z. M. (2017). Analysis of the efficiency of levers in the context of implementation of the state regulatory policy. Economic Annals-XXI, 165(5-6), 41–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V165-09
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Guo, C., & Wan, B. (2022). The digital divide in online learning in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology in Society, 71, 102122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102122
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Hallward-Driemeier, M., Nayyar, G., Fengler, W., Aridi, A., Gill, I., & Aridi, A. (2020). Europe 4.0: Addressing the digital dilemma. Washington, DC: World Bank.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/34746
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Hung, B. Q., Nham, N. T. H., & Ha, L. T. (2023). The importance of digitalization in powering environmental innovation performance of European countries. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100284
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Krawczak, M., & Szkatuła, G. (2020). On matching of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 517, 254–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.11.050
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Kučera, J., & Fiľa, M. (2022). R&D expenditure, innovation performance and economic development of the EU countries. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 227–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.9.3(14)
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Liao, S.-C., Chou, T.-C., & Huang, C.-H. (2022). Revisiting the development trajectory of the digital divide: A main path analysis approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121607
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Liu, M., Li, C., Wang, S., & Li, Q. (2023). Digital transformation, risk-taking, and innovation: Evidence from data on listed enterprises in China. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100332
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Luo, Y., Cui, H., Zhong, H., & Wei, C. (2023). Business environment and enterprise digital transformation. Finance Research Letters, 57, 104250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104250
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Ma, T., Zhang, S., Zhu, S., Ni, J., Wu, Q., & Liu, M. (2022). The new role of nursing in digital inclusion: Reflections on smartphone use and willingness to increase digital skills among Chinese older adults. Geriatric Nursing, 48, 118–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.09.004
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Malkowska, A., Urbaniec, M., & Kosala, M. (2021). The impact of digital transformation on European countries: Insights from a comparative analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(2), 325–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.012
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Marhraoui, M. A. (2023). Digital skills for project managers: A systematic literature Review. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 1591–1598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.451
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Marti, L., & Puertas, R. (2023). Analysis of European competitiveness based on its innovative capacity and digitalization level. Technology in Society, 72, 102206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102206
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Megits, N., Neskorodieva, I., & Schuster, J. (2020). Impact assessment of the COVID-19 on trade between Eastern Europe and China. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 7(3), 385–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v7i3.579
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Nadoleanu, G., Stăiculescu, A. R., & Bran, E. (2022). The multifaceted challenges of the digital transformation: Creating a sustainable society. Postmodern Openings, 13, 300–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1Sup1/428
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Nosratabadi, S., Atobishi, T., & Hegedűs, S. (2023). Social sustainability of digital transformation: Empirical evidence from EU-27 countries. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), 126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050126
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Ordanini, A., Parasuraman, A., & Rubera, G. (2014). When the recipe is more important than the ingredients a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) of service innovation confgurations. Journal of Service Research, 17(2), 134–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670513513337
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Pappas, I. O. (2018). User experience in personalized online shopping: A fuzzy-set analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 52(7/8), 1679–1703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2017-0707
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Pappas, I. O., Kourouthanassis, P. E., Giannakos, M. N., & Chrissikopoulos, V. (2016). Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 794–803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.010
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2022). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.007
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Pliskin, N., Levy, M., Heart, T., O’Flaherty, B., & O’Dea, P. (2006). The corporate digital divide between smaller and larger firms. In E. M. Trauth, D. Howcroft, T. Butler, B. Fitzgerald & J. I. DeGross (Eds). Social inclusion: Societal and organizational implications for information systems. (pp. 413–417). Boston: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34588-4_27
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Polozova, T., Kolupaieva, I., & Sheiko, I. (2021). Digital gap in EU countries and its impact on labour productivity and global competitiveness. In Hradec economic days, part 1 (pp. 569–570). Hradec Králové: University of Hradec Králové. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36689/uhk/hed/2021-01-065
    View in Google Scholar
  43. PwC (2012). Maximizing the impact of digitization. Retrieved from https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/m1/en/reports/2011-2014/maximizing-impac t-digitization.html.
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Rajbhandari, A., & Zhang, F. (2021). Does energy efficiency promote economic growth? Evidence from a multi-country and multi-sector panel data set. World Bank Group.
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., & Hussein, S. (2023). A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon, 9(4), e14878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14878
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Sánchez-Torres, J. A. (2019). Moderating effect of the digital divide of e-commerce. International Journal of Social Economics, 46, 12, 1387–1400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-11-2018-0622
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Schmitt, A. K., Grawe, A., & Woodside, A. G. (2017). Illustrating the power of fsQCA in explaining paradoxical consumer environmental orientations. Psychology & Marketing, 34(3), 323–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20991
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics, 39(2), 145–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.003
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Skare, M., & Riberio Soriano, D. (2021). How globalization is changing digital technology adoption: An international perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 222–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2021.04.001
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Sun, C., Lin, Z., Vochozka, M., & Vincúrová, Z. (2022). Digital transformation and corporate cash holdings in China’s A-share listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1081–1116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.031
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Sun, C., Zhang, Z., Vochozka, M. ., & Vozňáková, I. (2022). Enterprise digital transformation and debt financing cost in China’s Ashare listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(3), 783–829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.023
    View in Google Scholar
  52. The World Bank Group (2020). Europe 4.0: Addressing Europe's digital dilemma. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/eca/publication/addressi ng-europes-digital-dilemma.
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Tutak, M., & Brodny, J. (2022). Business digital maturity in Europe and its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8, 1, 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010027
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Ulas, D. (2019). Digital transformation process and SMEs. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 662–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.101
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Van Kessel, R., Wong, B .L. H., Rubinić, I., O’Nuallain, E., & Czabanowska, K. (2022). Is Europe prepared to go digital? Making the case for developing digital capacity: An exploratory analysis of Eurostat survey data. PLOS Digit Health, 1(2), e0000013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000013
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Woodside, A. G. (2017). The complexity turn: Cultural, management, and marketing applications. Berlin: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47028-3
    View in Google Scholar
  58. World Economic Forum (2022). 70% of homes in the EU have high-speed internet – but a digital divide persists. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/ 2022/09/eu-high-speed-internet-digital-divide/.
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 234

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.