Post global financial crisis multiplex financial network structure longevity: Does it predict re-globalization? Empirical investigation for 234 countries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3023

Keywords:

multiplex financial network, structure longevity, global financial crisis, re-globalization

Abstract

Research background: International capital flows show decreasing trend after each financial crisis as countries become unwilling to invest in risky counterparties. Recent discussions over structural changes within the global financial network suggest that its structure may be still undergoing some changes. Uncovered weaknesses of over-connectedness with unstable un-ally countries during global financial crisis were further highlighted by recent Covid-19 pandemic. However, previous research suggest that important structural changes happened after global financial crisis. Thus, such situation raises a question whether post global financial crisis multiplex network structure is long-term and is it exhibiting re-globalization pattern as suggested by re-globalization megatrend.

Purpose of the article: The main objective of the paper is to assess post global financial crisis multiplex financial network structure longevity and to identify whether it exhibits re-globalization pattern.

Methods: Multiplex financial network mapping, network topological analysis and structure longevity methods were employed to evaluate network connectedness, topological structural properties of multiplex financial network and its’ structure longevity. 5-layer multiplex financial network was mapped for different types of capital flows for each layer: net direct and portfolio investments in debt, equity and net banking assets for each year in the post global financial crisis period 2009–2020. Each network layer employed bilateral data from up to 234 countries of the world. Next step of research employed a set of network-level measures defining topological features of each network in the period of 2009–2020 in order to capture the trend of structural changes and evidence of re-globalization. The final stage analyzes multiplex financial network structure by layer and country longevity.

Findings & value added: Analysis reveals that stock (positions) multiplex financial network aggregate connectedness, i.e., density and value, increased during post- global financial crisis period until Covid-19 pandemic period, thus, suggesting that globalization in terms of stock is continuing. Topological structural properties of multiplex financial network changed as number of strongly and weakly connected countries decreased and more countries became included in network. Longevity analysis of layer and country structure within multiplex financial network reveal that banking and debt investments are increasing since 2018, while equity part is decreasing. Developed countries, i.e., the United Kingdom and Germany, decrease in multiplex financial network structure, while developing, especially from Asia region (i.e., Hong Kong SAR, China and Singapore) increase. Such empirical results support the re-globalization megatrend in terms of investment type and counterparty structure as highlighted by most recent scientific discussion showing that it started early after global financial crisis. Research also uncovers some regional trends of Asia region increasing in investment network structure, while Europe decreasing. As developing countries attract more and more investment and further develop, global cost saving and, thus, returns from global investment into these countries may be decreasing, resulting in lower gain from globalization. Our analysis may facilitate investment strategy decisions by suggesting that even though gains from globalization might be decreasing, instead of localization, countries could follow ally investment strategy to manage the risk of over-dependency from unstable counterparty while preserving globalization wealth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Artime, O., & De Domenico, M. (2021). Percolation on feature-enriched interconnected systems. Nature Communications, 12(1), 2478.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22721-z
View in Google Scholar

Bardoscia, M., Barucca, P., Battiston, S., Caccioli, F., Cimini, G., Garlaschelli, D., Saracco, F., Squartini, T., & Caldarelli, G. (2021). The physics of financial networks. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(7), 490–507.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00322-5
View in Google Scholar

BIS convention (2020). Convention for country groupings. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/statistics/country_groupings.pdf (08.03.2023).
View in Google Scholar

BIS LBS by residence data (2020). Bilateral cross-border claims data. Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/statistics/bankstats.htm (08.03.2023).
View in Google Scholar

Bishop, M. L., & Payne, A. (2021). Steering towards reglobalization: Can a reformed G20 rise to the occasion? Globalizations, 18(1), 120–140.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1779964
View in Google Scholar

Bonaccorsi, G., Riccaboni, M., Fagiolo, G., & Santoni, G. (2019). Country centrality in the international multiplex network. Applied Network Science, 4(1), 126.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-019-0207-3
View in Google Scholar

Bremus, F., & Fratzscher, M. (2015). Drivers of structural change in cross-border banking since the global financial crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 52, 32–59.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.11.012
View in Google Scholar

Cartas, J. M., & Harutyunyan, A. (2017). Monetary and financial statistics manual and compilation guide. USA: IMF. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.imf.org/ display/book/9781513579191/9781513579191.xml (08.03.2024).
View in Google Scholar

CDIS (2020). Coordinated direct investment survey. IMF. Retrieved from https://data.imf.org/?sk=40313609-F037-48C1-84B1-E1F1CE54D6D5 (08.03.2024).
View in Google Scholar

CDIS guide (2015). The coordinated direct investment survey guide 2015. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/pdf/cdisguide.pdf. (08.03.2024).
View in Google Scholar

Cerutti, E., & Zhou, H. (2017). The global banking network in the aftermath of the crisis: Is there evidence of de-globalization? IMF Working Paper, 17(232).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484324868.001
View in Google Scholar

Clift, B., & Robles, T. (2021). The IMF, tackling inequality, and post-neoliberal ‘reglobalization’: The paradoxes of political legitimation within economistic parameters. Globalizations, 18(1), 39–54.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1774325
View in Google Scholar

CPIS (2020). Coordinated portfolio investment survey. IMF. Retrieved from https://data.imf.org/?sk=B981B4E3-4E58-467E-9B90-9DE0C3367363 (08.03.2024).
View in Google Scholar

DataBank. The world bank (2022). Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank. org/home.aspx (08.03.2024).
View in Google Scholar

Del Rio-Chanona, R. M., Korniyenko, Y., Patnam, M., & Porter, M. A. (2020). The multiplex nature of global financial contagions. Applied Network Science, 5(1), 74.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-020-00301-2
View in Google Scholar

Garcia-Herrero, A. (2022). Slowbalisation in the context of US-China decoupling. Intereconomics, 57(6), 352–358.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-022-1086-x
View in Google Scholar

Ghauri, P. N., Strange, R., & Cooke, F. L. (2021). Research on international business: The new realities. International Business Review, 30(2), 101794.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101794
View in Google Scholar

Ghosh, A. (2017). How does banking sector globalization affect economic growth? International Review of Economics & Finance, 48, 83–97.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.11.011
View in Google Scholar

Kandil, N., Battaïa, O., & Hammami, R. (2020). Globalisation vs. Slowbalisation: A literature review of analytical models for sourcing decisions in supply chain management. Annual Reviews in Control, 49, 277–287.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.04.004
View in Google Scholar

Kinsley, A. C., Rossi, G., Silk, M. J., & VanderWaal, K. (2020). Multilayer and multiplex networks: An introduction to their use in veterinary epidemiology. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 596.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00596
View in Google Scholar

Korniyenko, Y., Patnam, M., Del Rio-Chanon, R. M., & Porter, M. A. (2018). Evolution of the global financial network and contagion: A new approach. IMF Working Paper, 18.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3221170
View in Google Scholar

Kostoska, O., Mitikj, S., Jovanovski, P., & Kocarev, L. (2020). Core-periphery structure in sectoral international trade networks: A new approach to an old theory. PLOS ONE, 15(4), e0229547.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229547
View in Google Scholar

Kubelec, C., & Sá, F. (2010). The geographical composition of national external balance sheets: 1980-2005. Social Science Research Network.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1577143
View in Google Scholar

Lambert, F., Deb, P., Ehrentraud, J., & Gonzįlez-Hermosillo, B. (2015). International banking after the crisis: Increasingly local and safer? Global financial stability report, International Monetary Fund. Monetary and Capital Markets Department April 2015.
View in Google Scholar

Lane, P. R., & Milesi‐Ferretti, G. M. (2017). International financial integration in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. IMF Working Paper, 17(115).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484300336.001
View in Google Scholar

Lund, S., Windhagen, E., Manyika, J., Härle, P., Woetzel, J., & Goldshtein, D. (2017). The new dynamics of financial globalization. McKinsey Global Institute, August.
View in Google Scholar

Madhok, A. (2021). Globalization, de-globalization, and re-globalization: Some historical context and the impact of the COVID pandemic. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 24(3), 199–203.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211008904
View in Google Scholar

Martínez-Jaramillo, S., Alexandrova-Kabadjova, B., Bravo-Benítez, B., & Solórzano-Margain, J. P. (2014). An empirical study of the Mexican banking system’s network and its implications for systemic risk. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 40, 242–265.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2014.01.009
View in Google Scholar

Milesi‐Ferretti, G. M., & Tille, C. (2011). The great retrenchment: international capital flows during the global financial crisis. Economic Policy, 26(66), 289–346.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2011.00263.x
View in Google Scholar

Minoiu, C., & Reyes, J. A. (2011). A network analysis of global banking: 1978-2009. Social Science Research Network.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1808447
View in Google Scholar

Naimy, V., Khoury, R., Montero , J.-M., & Souk, J. (2023). Post-Brexit exchange rate volatility and its impact on UK exports to eurozone countries: A bounds testing approach. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 135–168.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.004
View in Google Scholar

Paltalidis, N., Gounopoulos, D., Kizys, R., & Koutelidakis, Y. (2015). Transmission channels of systemic risk and contagion in the European financial network. Journal of Banking and Finance, 61, S36–S52.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.03.021
View in Google Scholar

Paul, T. V. (2021). Globalization, deglobalization and reglobalization: Adapting liberal international order. International Affairs, 97(5), 1599–1620.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab072
View in Google Scholar

Rahmede, C., Iacovacci, J., Arenas, À., & Bianconi, G. (2018). Centralities of nodes and influences of layers in large multiplex networks. Journal of Complex Networks, 6(5), 733–752.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnx050
View in Google Scholar

Scott, J., & Wilkinson, R. (2021). Reglobalizing trade: progressive global governance in an age of uncertainty. Globalizations, 18(1), 55–69.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1779965
View in Google Scholar

Shein-Chung, C., Jun, S., & Hansheng, W. (2002). A note on sample size calculation for mean comparisons based on noncentral t-statistics. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 12(4), 441–456. https://doi: 10.1081/BIP-120016229.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/BIP-120016229
View in Google Scholar

Silva, T. C., Souza, S. R., & Tabak, B. M. (2016). Network structure analysis of the Brazilian interbank market. Emerging Markets Review, 26, 130–152.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2015.12.004
View in Google Scholar

Tonzer, L. (2015). Cross-border interbank networks, banking risk and contagion. Journal of Financial Stability, 18, 19–32.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2015.02.002
View in Google Scholar

Tuninetti, M., Aleta, A., Paolotti, D., Moreno, Y., & Starnini, M. (2021). Prediction of new scientific collaborations through multiplex networks. EPJ Data Science, 10, 25.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00282-x
View in Google Scholar

Wang, Z., & Sun, Z. (2021). From globalization to regionalization: The United States, China, and the Post-COVID-19 world Economic order. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 26(1), 69–87.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09706-3
View in Google Scholar

Yeyati, E. L., & Williams, T. (2014). Financial globalization in emerging economies: Much ado about nothing? EconomíA, 14(2), 91–131.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.2014.a544790
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Gaigaliene, A., & Jurakovaite, O. (2024). Post global financial crisis multiplex financial network structure longevity: Does it predict re-globalization? Empirical investigation for 234 countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(1), 23–57. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3023

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.