Can fiscal policy spur fertility?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.009Keywords:
fertility, optimal taxation, pronatalistic policyAbstract
Research background: The decreasing fertility rate is a serious problem for policymakers as it affects the pension system as well as private consumption and savings. It seems reasonable to analyze whether fiscal policy may mitigate the low birthrate problem.
Purpose of the article: In this paper we strive to answer the question whether fiscal incentives spur fertility if parents are rational.
Methods: A theoretical economic model of utility maximization is applied to analyze the impact of fiscal policy on fertility. The conclusions are based on the analysis of comparative statics simulation calibrated for actual data from Poland.
Findings & Value added: The results indicate that a substantial fertility effect can be obtained by raising subsidies for children or general benefits for families.
Downloads
References
Angrist, D., Evans, W. N., Rosenzweig, R., & Wolpin, K. I. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply: evidence from exogenous variation in family size. American Economic Review, 88(3).
View in Google Scholar
Apps, P., & Rees, R. (2004). Fertility, taxation and family policy. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(4). doi: 10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00386.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00386.x
View in Google Scholar
Baughman, R., & Dickert-Conlin, S. (2009). The earned income tax credit and fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 22(3). doi: 10.1007/s00148-007-0177-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-007-0177-0
View in Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In Demographic and economic change in developed countries. New York: NBER.
View in Google Scholar
Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and the quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2). doi: 10.1086/260166.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260166
View in Google Scholar
Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1976). Child endowments and the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 84(4).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260536
View in Google Scholar
Bobrowicz, B. (2007). Alokacja czasu: praca zawodowa i edukacja versus funkcje opiekuńcze i prace domowe. In I. Kotowska (Ed.). Aktywność zawodowa i edukacyjna a obowiązki rodzinne w Polsce. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
View in Google Scholar
Boldrin, M., de Nardi, M., & Jones, L. E. (2015). Fertility and social security. Journal of Demographic Economics, 81(3). doi: 10.1017/dem.2014.14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2014.14
View in Google Scholar
Cigno, A. (1986). Fertility and the tax benefit system: a reconsideration of the theory of family taxation. Economic Journal, 96(384). doi: 10.2307/2233172.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2233172
View in Google Scholar
Cigno, A. (2001). Comparative advantage, observability and the optimal tax treatment of families with children. International Tax and Public Finance, 8(4).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011275109138
View in Google Scholar
Cigno, A., & Pettini, A. (2002). Taxing family size and subsidizing child-specific commodities? Journal of Public Economics, 85(1). doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00119-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00119-0
View in Google Scholar
Cremer, H., Dellis, A., & Pestieau, P. (2003). Family size and optimal income taxation. Journal of Population Economics, 16(1). doi: 10.1007/ s001480100113.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480100113
View in Google Scholar
Cukrowska-Torzewska, E. (2016). How much does it cost to rear children in Poland? European Journal of Women's Studies, 23(2). doi: 10.1177/ 1350506815586468.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506815586468
View in Google Scholar
Dilnot, A., & McCrae, J. (2000). The family credit system and the working families tax credit in the United Kingdom. OECD Economic Studies, 31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1920/bn.ifs.1999.0003
View in Google Scholar
Ehrlich, I., & Kim, J. (2005). Social security, demographic trends, and economic growth: theory and evidence from the international experience. NBER Working Paper, 11121.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w11121
View in Google Scholar
Espenshade, T. J., Guzman, J. C., & Westoff, C. F. (2003). The surprising global variation in replacement fertility. Population Research and Policy Review. 22(5). doi: 10.1023/B:POPU.0000020882.29684.8e.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000020882.29684.8e
View in Google Scholar
Eurostat (2018). Total fertility rate. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat /tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tsdde220& (03.04.2018).
View in Google Scholar
Van Groezen, B., & Meijdam, L. (2008). Growing old and staying young: population policy in an ageing closed economy. Journal of Population Economics, 21(3). doi: 10.1007/s00148-006-0067-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0067-x
View in Google Scholar
GUS (2017). Budżety gospodarstw domowych w 2016 r. Warsaw.
View in Google Scholar
GUS (2018). Rocznik statystyczny pracy 2017. Warsaw.
View in Google Scholar
Kearney, M. S. (2004). Is there an effect of incremental welfare benefits on fertility behavior? A look at the family cap. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2). doi: 10.2307/3559016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3559016
View in Google Scholar
Kögel, T. (2004). Did the association between fertility and female employment within OECD countries really change its sign? Journal of Population Economics, 17(1). doi: 10.1007/s00148-003-0180-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-003-0180-z
View in Google Scholar
Kudła, J. (2014). The impact of fiscal instruments on fertility: a synthesis of the economic theory. Journal of Economics and Management, 18.
View in Google Scholar
Laroque, G., & Salanié, B. (2004). Fertility and financial incentives in France. CESifo Economic Studies, 50(3). doi: 10.1093/cesifo/50.3.423.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/50.3.423
View in Google Scholar
OECD (2017). Taxing wages 2017. Paris.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/tax_wages-2017-en
View in Google Scholar
Ohinata, A. (2011). Fertility response to financial incentives evidence from the working families tax credit in the UK. SSRN Electronic Journal, 851. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1117484.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1117484
View in Google Scholar
Smallwood, S. (2002). New estimates of trends in births by birth order in England and Wales. Population Trends, 108.
View in Google Scholar
Sommer, K. (2016). Fertility choice in a life cycle model with idiosyncratic uninsurable earnings risk. Journal of Monetary Economics, 83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2016.08.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2016.08.002
View in Google Scholar
de Tray, D. (1973). Child quality and the demand for children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2). doi: 10.1086/260154.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260154
View in Google Scholar
Werding, M. (2010). The economics of the family and its policy implications: why should we care about fertility outcomes? In N. Takayama, M. Werding (Ed.) Fertility and public policy: how to reverse the trend of declining birth rates. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014519.003.0002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014519.003.0002
View in Google Scholar
Yasuoka, M., & Goto, N. (2015). How is the child allowance to be financed? By income tax or consumption tax? International Review of Economics, 62(3). doi: 10.1007/s12232-014-0200-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-014-0200-1
View in Google Scholar
Zhang, J. (1997). Fertility, growth and public investments in children. Canadian Journal of Economics, 30(4a). doi: 10.2307/136272.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/136272
View in Google Scholar
