Harmonization of the protection against misleading commercial practices: ongoing divergences in Central European countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.012Keywords:
Unfair Commercial Practice Directive, harmonization, legislation, case law, misleadingAbstract
Research background: Modern European integration focuses on competition in the internal single market, embracing both competitiveness and consumer protection, and it aims at full harmonization in this arena. The hallmark, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive from 2005, aims to overcome diverse social, political, legal and economic traditions. Is the implied protection against misleading practices an opportunity or a threat for Central European Regions?
Purpose of the article: The primary purpose is to comparatively describe and critically assess the transposed legal frameworks. The secondary purpose is to study and evaluate their coherence in the light of the case law and their impact in Central Europe, in particular whether it represents an opportunity or a threat for the smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, i.e. boosting competitiveness and innovation along with consumer welfare.
Methods: The cross-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional nature of this paper, and its dual purposes, implies the use of Meta-Analysis, of various interpretation techniques suitable for legal texts and judicial decisions, of the critical comparison and of a holistic assessment of approaches and impacts. Legislation and case law are explored and the yielded knowledge and data are confronted with a field search and case studies. The dominating qualitative research and data are complemented by the quantitative research and data.
Findings & Value added: For over one decade, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive has required full harmonization of the protection against, among other items, misleading commercial practices, by legislatures and judges in the EU. The exploration pursuant to the two purposes suggests that this ambitious legislative and case law project entails a number of transposition approaches with varying levels of coherence, importance and impacts on the competitiveness and innovation of business and consumer welfare in Central Europe. Therefore, full harmonization should be either readjusted or relaxed.
Downloads
References
Areeda, Ph. E. (1996). The Socratic method. Harvard Law Review, 109(5).
View in Google Scholar
Azolai, L. (2011). The force and forms of European legal integration. EUI Working Papers, 2011/6. Retrieved from http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream /handle/1814/16894 /LAW_2011_06.pdf?sequence=1 (1.1.2017)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1899484
View in Google Scholar
Balcerzak, A. P. (2015). Europe 2020 strategy and structural diversity between old and new member states. Application of zero unitarization method for dynamic analysis in the years 2004-2013. Economics & Sociology, 8(2). doi: 10.14254/2071- 789X.2015/8-2/14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2015/8-2/14
View in Google Scholar
Balcerzak, A. P. (2016a). Technological potential of European economy. Proposition of measurement with application of multiple criteria decision analysis. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 12(3). doi: 10.14254/1800-5845.2016/12-3/1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845.2016/12-3/1
View in Google Scholar
Balcerzak, A. P. (2016b). Fiscal burden in the European Union member states. Economic Annals - XXI, 161(9-10). doi: 10.21003/ea.V161-01.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V161-01
View in Google Scholar
Bočková, N., & Meluzín, T. (2016). Electronics industry: R&D investments as possible factors of firms competitiveness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.468.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.468
View in Google Scholar
Chirita, A. D. (2014). A legal-historical review of the EU competition rules. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 63(2). doi: 10.1017/S00205 89314000037.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589314000037
View in Google Scholar
Chronopoulos, A. (2014). Legal and economic arguments for the protection of advertising value through trade mark law. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 4(4). doi: 10.4337/qmjip.2014.04.01.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2014.04.01
View in Google Scholar
Cvik, E. D., & MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2016). Implementation of directive 2014/17/EU and its impact on EU and member states markets, from not only a Czech perspectives. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.472.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.472
View in Google Scholar
Çolak, M. S., & Ege, A. (2013). An assessment of EU 2020 strategy: too far to reach? Social Indicators Research, 110(2). doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9950-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9950-2
View in Google Scholar
Damro, C. (2012). Market power Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5). doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.646779.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.646779
View in Google Scholar
Erixon, F. (2010). The Europe 2020 strategy: time for Europe to think again. European View, 9. doi: 10.1007/s12290-010-0120-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-010-0120-8
View in Google Scholar
European Commission (2010). COM (2010) 2020 Communication from the Commission Europe 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20 BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20ve rsion.pdf (8.08.2018).
View in Google Scholar
Flisikowski, K., & Kucharska, W. (2018). The condition of economies. Do most valuable global brands matter?. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(2). doi:10.24136/eq.2018.013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.013
View in Google Scholar
Jindrichovska, I., & Purcarea, I. (2011). CSR and environmental reporting in the Czech Republic and Romania: country comparison of rules and practices. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 10(2).
View in Google Scholar
Jindrichovska, I., & Kubickova, D. (2017). The role and current status of IFRS in the completion of national accounting rules–Evidence from the Czech Republic. Accounting in Europe, 14(1-2).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2017.1301671
View in Google Scholar
Knapp, V. (1995). Teorie práva. Praha, ČR: C. H. Beck.
View in Google Scholar
Lajtkepová, E. (2016). Differences and similarities in the indebtedness of EU member states after last financial crisis. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(4). doi: 10.12775/OeC.2016.031.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2016.031
View in Google Scholar
Landmesser, J. (2019). Differences in income distributions for men and women in the European Union countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy,14(1). doi: 10.24136/eq.2019.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2019.004
View in Google Scholar
MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2012). And the best top level domain for European enterprises is ... . International And Comparative Law Review, 12(2).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iclr-2016-0085
View in Google Scholar
MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2014). Selected current aspects and issues of European integration. Ostrava: Key Publishing.
View in Google Scholar
MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2017). European myriad of approaches to parasitic commercial practices. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(2). doi: 10.24136/oc.v 8i2.11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.v8i2.11
View in Google Scholar
MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2018). Fostering innovation – a myth or reality of the EU in 2018. In M. Staníčková, L. Melecký, E. Kovářová & K. Dvoroková (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th international conference on European integration 2018. Ostrava.
View in Google Scholar
MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019a). The fair analysis of the case law of the court of justice of EU on the unfair commerical practices. Acta Academica Karviniensia, 19(1).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25142/aak.2019.004
View in Google Scholar
MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019b). R&D expenditure and innovation in the EU and selected member states. JEMI, 15(1). doi: 10.7341/20191511.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7341/20191511
View in Google Scholar
MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019c). Corporate social responsibility information in annual reports in the EU – Czech case study. Sustainability, 11. doi: 10.3390/su11010237.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010237
View in Google Scholar
MacGregor Pelikánová, R., Císařová, J., & Beneš, M. (2017). The misleading perception of the purpose of the protection against misleading advertising by the EU law and its impact in the Czech Republic. Lawyer Quarterly, 7(3).
View in Google Scholar
Margoni, T. (2016). The protection of sports event in the EU: property, intellectual property, unfair competition and special forms of protection. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 47(4). doi: 10.1007/ s40319-016-0475-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0475-8
View in Google Scholar
Melecký, L. (2018). The main achievements of the EU structural funds 2007–2013 in the EU member states: efficiency analysis of transport sector. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(2). doi: 10.24136/eq.2018.015.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.015
View in Google Scholar
Ng, C. W. (2016). The law of passing off – goodwill beyond goods. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 47(7). doi: 10.1007/s403 19-016-0510-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0510-9
View in Google Scholar
Osuji, O. K. (2011). Business-to-consumer harassment, unfair commercial practices directive and the UK – a distorted picture of uniform harmonisation? Journal of Consumer Policy, 34. doi: 10.1007/s10603-011-9175-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9175-4
View in Google Scholar
Pakšiová, R. (2016). CSR reporting in Slovakia. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on European integration 2016. Ostrava: VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava.
View in Google Scholar
Pasimeni, F., & Pasimeni, P. (2016). An institutional analysis of the Europe 2020 strategy. Social Indicator Research, 127(3). doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1013-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1013-7
View in Google Scholar
Piekarczyk, A. (2016). Contemporary organization and a perspective on integration and development. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(3). doi: 10.12775/OeC.2016.027.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2016.027
View in Google Scholar
Polcyn, J. (2018). Human development level as a modifier of education efficiency. Management-Poland, 22(2). doi: 10.2478/manment-2018-0030.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/manment-2018-0030
View in Google Scholar
Pohulak-Żoledowska, E. (2016). Innovation in Contemporary Economies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(3). doi: 10.12775/OeC.2016.026.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2016.026
View in Google Scholar
Rogalska, E. (2018). Multiple-criteria analysis of regional entrepreneurship conditions in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(4). doi: 10.24136/eq.2018.034.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.034
View in Google Scholar
Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research – a practical handbook. London: SAGE.
View in Google Scholar
Staníčková, M. (2017). Can the implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy goals be efficient? The challenge for achieving social equality in the European Union. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(3). doi: 10.24136/eq.v12i3.20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i3.20
View in Google Scholar
Stec, M., & Grzeby, M. (2017). The implementation of the Strategy Europe 2020 objectives in European Union countries: the concept analysis and statistical evaluation. Quality & Quantity, 52(1). doi: 10.1007/s11135-016-0454-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0454-7
View in Google Scholar
Teasuro, C., & Russo, C. (2008). Unfair commercial practices and misleading and comparative advertising: an analysis of the harmonization of EU legislation in view of the Italian implementation of the rules. Competition Policy International, 4(1). doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00047-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00047-0
View in Google Scholar
Turečková, K., & Nevima, J. (2017). European funds – risk management by public colleges. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D, 24(41).
View in Google Scholar
Vivant, M. (2016). Building a common culture IP? International revue of intellectual property and competition law, 47(3). doi: 10.1007/s40319-016-0472-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0472-y
View in Google Scholar
Żelazny, R., & Pietrucha, J. (2017). Measuring innovation and institution: the creative economy index. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(1). doi:10.24136/eq.v12i1.3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i1.3
View in Google Scholar
