Estimating an impact of base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) countermeasures ? a case of business group


  • Renata Legenzova Vytautas Magnus University
  • Kristina Levišauskaitė Vytautas Magnus University
  • Egidijus Kundelis Vytautas Magnus University



BEPS, BEPS countermeasures, business group, tax compliance costs


Research background: Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) is a reduction of corporate income tax base and related corporate income tax payments via taking advantage of tax loopholes. OECD prepared 15 BEPS actions, which set countermeasures to fight tax avoid-ance in a coordinated way and shall be implement by countries on a voluntary basis. Literature review revealed that on a macro-level and company-level the extent of BEPS is large and statistically significant while studies addressing micro-level (transaction-level) impact and BEPS countermeasures? related issues are limited.

Purpose of the article: to identify methods and metrics available for evaluation of BEPS countermeasures? impact on a micro-level and to assess BEPS countermeasures? impact on a business group.

Methods: the paper employs comparative analysis of scientific and professional literature to identify approaches and methods available for evaluation of BEPS countermeasures? impact on a micro-level; and a case analysis method to assess an expected impact of BEPS coun-termeasures on a specific business group. 

Findings & Value added: An approach used to estimate BEPS countermeasures impact on the micro-level differs from the one applied in macro-level analysis. To conduct the case analysis, OECD?s proposed macro-level fiscal impact assessment approach has been adapted for a micro-level analysis. It includes the analysis of the transactions subject to BEPS countermeasures and develops an action plan to manage related risks. The conducted case analysis differs from previous research as it employs transaction-level data and estimates fiscal effect of BEPS countermeasures on a micro-level. Analysis of the activities of the specific business group revealed that 5 from 15 countermeasures are relevant and directly applicable to this business group. They would not have an immediate significant direct fiscal effect, but risks related to BEPS countermeasures exist and action plans to manage negative effects of BEPS countermeasures have to be implemented.


Download data is not yet available.


Bartelsman, E. J., & Beetsma, R. M. (2003). Why pay more? Corporate tax avoid-ance through transfer pricing in OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9-10). doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00018-X.
Beer, S., & J. Loeprick (2015). Profit shifting: drivers of transfer (mis)pricing and the potential of countermeasures. International Tax and Public Finance, 22(3). doi: 10.1007/s10797-014-9323-2.
De Simone, L. (2016). Does a common set of accounting standards affect tax-motivated income shifting for multinational firms? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.06.002.
Dharmapala, D. (2014). What do we know about base erosion and profit shifting? A review of the empirical literature. Fiscal Studies, 35(4) doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2014.12037.x.
Dischinger, M., & Riedel, N. (2011). Corporate taxes and the location of intangible assets within multinational firms. Journal of Public Economics, 95. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.12.002.
Egger, P., Eggert, W., & Winner, H. (2010). Saving taxes through foreign plant ownership. Journal of International Economics, 81(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco. 2009.12.004.
European Commission (2015). Commission staff working document. Corporate income taxation in the European Union. SWD/2015/121. Retrieved from (18.03.2017).
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Account-ing and Economics, 50(2-3). doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002.
Hines, J. R. Jr, & Rice, E. M. (1994). Fiscal paradise: foreign tax havens and American business. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(1). doi: 10.2307/2118431.
Huizinga, H., & Laeven, L. (2008). International profit shifting within multination-als: a multi-country perspective. Journal of Public Economics, 92 (5-6). doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.11.002.
Ito, J., & Komoriya, Y. (2015). The impact of transfer pricing regulations on the location decisions of MNEs. In T. Ishikava (Ed.). Firms? location selections and regional policy in the global economy. Springer Japan. doi:
Janssens, P., Ledure, D., Vandepitte, B. & Loos, J. (2015). The end of intra-group financing?or not just yet? European Taxation, 55(8).
Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study re-search. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1).
Markle, K. S., &Shackelford, D. (2011). Cross-country comparisons of corporate income taxes. NBER Working Paper, 16839.
OECD (2015). Measuring and monitoring BEPS. ACTION 11: 2015 final report. OECD/G20 base erosion and profit shifting project. Retrieved from (11.02.2017).
Owens, J. (2014). BEPS: what?s in it for tax administrations? Tax Tribune, 31.
Reynolds, H., & Wier, L. (2016). Estimating profit shifting in South Africa using firm-level tax returns. WIDER Working Paper, 2016/128.
Riedel, N. (2014). Quantifying international tax avoidance: a review of the aca-demic literature. European Tax Policy Forum. Retrieved from (15.2.2016).
Rose, S., Spinks, N., & Canhoto, A.I. (2015) Management research: applying the principles. Routledge.
Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. London: SAGE.
Verlinder, I. (2015). OECD BEPS action 9: evaluating the devaluation of risk and capital. BNA Insights. Tax Management, 24(9)
Weichenrieder, A. J. (2009). Profit shifting in the EU: evidence from Germany. International Tax and Public Finance, 16(3). doi: 10.1007/s10797-008-9068-x.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods. SAGE Publications.




How to Cite

Legenzova, R., Levišauskaitė, K., & Kundelis, E. (2017). Estimating an impact of base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) countermeasures ? a case of business group. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(4), 621–642.