Reputation stability vs anti-crisis sustainability: under what circumstances will innovations, media activities and CSR be in higher demand?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.025Keywords:
reputation management system, corporate reputation, reputation ranking, reputation stability, corporate social responsibility, UkraineAbstract
Research background: The difference of war and peace can help gain an under-standing of the differences in the management of a company's reputation in terms of its stability as compared to the state of a reputation crisis. The question of practical confirmation, which is left open, is whether there is a positive correlation between the anti-crisis activity of the reputation management system and its stability in a long-term perspective, or whether these two factors are inversely related.
Purpose of the article: This research is essentially aimed at studying the impact of innovation activity, media activity, and corporate social responsibility on reputational stability as well as on anti-crisis reputational sustainability.
Methods: Indicators of innovation activity, media activity, corporate social responsibility, reputational stability, and anti-crisis reputational sustainability were collected in a sample of the most frequently mentioned in the media leading companies of the Ukrainian economy (N = 315), using an online survey done among 110 industry experts within the framework of the Reputation ACTIVists All-Ukrainian Ranking of Corporate Reputation Management Quality over February-March'2019 period. Structural equation modeling (SEM) in using the maximum likelihood estimation method was applied to examine the associations between above-mentioned indicators, according to the aim of the study.
Findings & Value added: The results of our study revealed: 1) the existence of a significant correlation between CSR and reputational stability; 2) innovative and media activity are the most significant variables to provide anti-crisis sustainability; 3) CSR is less important for ensuring anti-crisis sustainability than for maintaining reputational stability; 4) anti-crisis sustainability is significantly more dependent on media activity than reputational stability is. By better understanding the roles of innovation activity, media activity, and corporate social responsibility, the company?s management in Ukraine can leverage the results of the study to improve reputation management performance, differentiating approaches in circumstances of a crisis and stability.
Downloads
References
Aguilera-Caracuel, J., & Guerrero-Villegas, J. (2017). How corporate social responsibility helps MNEs to improve their reputation. The moderating effects of geographical diversification and operating in developing regions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4). doi: 10.1002/csr. 1465.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1465
View in Google Scholar
Aramburu, I. A., & Pescador, I. G. (2017). The effects of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: the mediating effect of reputation in cooperative banks versus commercial banks in the Basque Country. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3). doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3438-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3438-1
View in Google Scholar
Ardito, L., Petruzzelli, A. M., Panniello, U., & Garavelli, A. C. (2019). Towards Industry 4.0. Business Process Management Journal, 25(2). doi: 10.1108/bpmj-04-2017-0088.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-04-2017-0088
View in Google Scholar
Baily, M. N., & Bosworth, B. P. (2014). US manufacturing: understanding its past and its potential future. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1). doi: 10.1257/ jep.28.1.3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.1.3
View in Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. doi: 10.4324/ 9781410600219.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600219
View in Google Scholar
Bruyaka, O., Zeitzmann, H. K., Chalamon, I., Wokutch, R. E., & Thakur, P. (2012). Strategic corporate social responsibility and orphan drug development: insights from the US and the EU biopharmaceutical industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1). doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1496-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1496-y
View in Google Scholar
Burianová, L., & Paulík, J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in commercial banking – a case study from the Czech Republic. Journal of Competitiveness, 6(1). doi: 10.7441/joc.2014.01.04.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2014.01.04
View in Google Scholar
Carter, S. M. (2006). The interaction of top management group, stakeholder, and situational factors on certain corporate reputation management activities. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006. 00632.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00632.x
View in Google Scholar
Caruana, A., Vella, J., Konietzny, J., & Chircop, S. (2018). Corporate greed: its effect on customer satisfaction, corporate social responsibility and corporate reputation among bank customers. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 23(3-4). doi: 10.1057/s41264-018-0050-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-018-0050-0
View in Google Scholar
Chung, S., Chong, M., Chua, J. S., & Na, J. C. (2019). Evolution of corporate reputation during an evolving controversy. Journal of Communication Management, 23(1). doi: 10.1108/jcom-08-2018-0072.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-08-2018-0072
View in Google Scholar
Coccia, M. (2018). A theory of the general causes of long waves: war, general purpose technologies, and economic change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.013
View in Google Scholar
Coombs, T., & Holladay, S. (2015). CSR as crisis risk: expanding how we conceptualize the relationship. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2). doi: 10.1108/ccij-10-2013-0078.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-10-2013-0078
View in Google Scholar
Derevianko, O. H. (2014). System of enterprise reputation management. Bіznes Іnform, 3.
View in Google Scholar
Derevianko, O. (2019). Reputation management in business: theory, methodology and country features (the case of Ukraine). Brussels: European World Publishing.
View in Google Scholar
Downes, M. (2017). University scandal, reputation and governance. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(1). doi: 10.1007/s40979-017-0019-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-017-0019-0
View in Google Scholar
Duhé, S. C. (2009). Good management, sound finances, and social responsibility: two decades of U.S. corporate insider perspectives on reputation and the bottom line. Public Relations Review, 35(1). doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.021.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.021
View in Google Scholar
Fang, W., Zhang, C., Shi, Z., Zhao, Q., & Shan, L. (2016). BTRES: beta-based trust and reputation evaluation system for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 59. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2015.06.013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.06.013
View in Google Scholar
Gangi, F., Meles, A., Dangelo, E., & Daniele, L. M. (2018). Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: are environmentally friendly banks less risky? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3). doi: 10.1002/csr.1699.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1699
View in Google Scholar
Gold, M. S., Bentler, P. M., & Kim, K. H. (2003). A Comparison of Maximum-Likelihood and Asymptotically Distribution-Free Methods of Treating Incomplete Nonnormal Data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 47–79. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1001_3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_3
View in Google Scholar
He, J., & Xiong, N. (2017). An effective information detection method for social big data. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(9). doi: 10.1007/s11042-017-5523-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5523-y
View in Google Scholar
Hejjas, K., Miller, G., & Scarles, C. (2018). “It’s like hating puppies!” Employee disengagement and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2). doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3791-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3791-8
View in Google Scholar
Hogarth, K., Hutchinson, M., & Scaife, W. (2016). Corporate philanthropy, reputation risk management and shareholder value: a study of Australian corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2). doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3205-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3205-8
View in Google Scholar
Janney, J. J., & Gove, S. (2011). Reputation and corporate social responsibility aberrations, trends, and hypocrisy: reactions to firm choices in the stock option backdating scandal. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7). doi: 10.1111/j. 1467-6486.2010.00984.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00984.x
View in Google Scholar
Javed, B., Khan, A. K., & Quratulain, S. (2018). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: examination of LMX perspective in small capitalized textile firms. Journal of Psychology, 152(8). doi: 10.1080/00223980.2018. 1489767.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2018.1489767
View in Google Scholar
Kiambi, D. M., & Shafer, A. (2016). Corporate crisis communication: examining the interplay of reputation and crisis response strategies. Mass Communication and Society, 19(2). doi: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1066013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1066013
View in Google Scholar
Kim, S. (2017). The process model of corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication: CSR communication and its relationship with consumers’ CSR knowledge, trust, and corporate reputation perception. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4). doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3433-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3433-6
View in Google Scholar
Lentjushenkova, O., Zarina, V., & Titko, J. (2019). Disclosure of intellectual capital in financial reports: case of Latvia. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(2). doi: 10.24136/oc.2019.017.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.017
View in Google Scholar
Malkawi, B. (2015). Habib Ahmed , Mehmet Asutay , and Rodney Wilson , eds. Islamic banking and financial crisis: reputation, stability and risks. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014. ISBN 978-0-7486-4761-3. Review of Middle East Studies, 49(1). doi: 10.1017/rms.2015.2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/rms.2015.2
View in Google Scholar
Mariconda, S., & Lurati, F. (2015). Ambivalence and reputation stability: an experimental investigation on the effects of new information. Corporate Reputation Review, 18(2). doi: 10.1057/crr.2015.4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2015.4
View in Google Scholar
Mariconda, S., & Lurati, F. (2015). Does familiarity breed stability? The role of familiarity in moderating the effects of new information on reputation judgments. Journal of Business Research, 68(5). doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09. 023.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.023
View in Google Scholar
Masharsky, A., Azarenkova, G., Oryekhova, K., & Yavorsky, S. (2018). Anti-crisis financial management on energy enterprises as a precondition of innovative conversion of the energy industry: case of Ukraine. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3. doi: 10.21272/mmi.2018.3-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.3-31
View in Google Scholar
Mason, A. (2016). Media frames and crisis events: understanding the impact on corporate reputations, responsibility attributions, and negative affect. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(3). doi: 10.1177/ 2329488416648951.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416648951
View in Google Scholar
Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: the new science of cause and effect. UK: Allen Lane, an imprint of Penguin Books.
View in Google Scholar
Parker, O., Krause, R., & Devers, C. E. (2019). How firm reputation shapes managerial discretion. Academy of Management Review, 44(2). doi: 10.5465/amr. 2016.0542.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0542
View in Google Scholar
Ranci, C., & Arlotti, M. (2019). Resistance to change. The problem of high non-take up in implementing policy innovations in the Italian long-term care system. Policy and Society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/14494035. 2019.1619995.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1619995
View in Google Scholar
Ranga, M. (2012). Stimulating R&D and innovation to address Romanias economic crisis: a bridge too far? European Planning Studies, 20(9). doi: 10.1080/ 09654313.2012.709145.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.709145
View in Google Scholar
Riggs, J. D., & Lalonde, T. L. (2017). Handbook for applied modeling: non-Gaussian and correlated data. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/ 9781316544778.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316544778
View in Google Scholar
Schuelke-Leech, B. (2018). A model for understanding the orders of magnitude of disruptive technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.033.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.033
View in Google Scholar
Shim, K., & Yang, S. (2016). The effect of bad reputation: the occurrence of crisis, corporate social responsibility, and perceptions of hypocrisy and attitudes toward a company. Public Relations Review, 42(1). doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev. 2015.11.009.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.009
View in Google Scholar
Shu, H., & Wong, S. M. (2017). When a sinner does a good deed: the path‐dependence of reputation repair. Journal of Management Studies, 55(5). doi: 10.1111/joms.12312.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12312
View in Google Scholar
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015). A beginners guide to structural equation modeling. London: Taylor and Francis.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749105
View in Google Scholar
Sims, R. (2009). Toward a better understanding of organizational efforts to rebuild reputation following an ethical scandal. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4). doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0058-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0058-4
View in Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1904). "General Intelligence," objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15(2). doi: 10.2307/1412107.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107
View in Google Scholar
Szwajca, D. (2018a). Dilemmas of reputation risk management: theoretical study. Corporate Reputation Review, 21(4). doi: 10.1057/s41299-018-0052-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-018-0052-9
View in Google Scholar
Szwajca, D. (2018b). Relationship between corporate image and corporate reputation in Polish banking sector. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(3). doi: 10.24136/oc. 2018.025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2018.025
View in Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2017). The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6). doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
View in Google Scholar
Vallaster, C. (2017). Managing a company crisis through strategic corporate social responsibility: a practice-based analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6). doi: 10.1002/csr.1424.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1424
View in Google Scholar
Vo, T. T., Xiao, X., & Ho, S. Y. (2017). How does corporate social responsibility engagement influence word of mouth on Twitter? Evidence from the airline industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2). doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3679-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3679-z
View in Google Scholar
Wang, Y., & Wanjek, L. (2018). How to fix a lie? The formation of Volkswagen’s post-crisis reputation among the German public. Corporate Reputation Review, 21(2). doi: 10.1057/s41299-018-0045-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-018-0045-8
View in Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Huang, J., & Xiong, N. (2019). An effective exponential-based trust and reputation evaluation system in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 7. doi: 10.1109/access.2019.2904544.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2904544
View in Google Scholar
Zheng, B., Liu, H., & Davison, R. M. (2018). Exploring the relationship between corporate reputation and the public’s crisis communication on social media. Public Relations Review, 44(1). doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.12.006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.12.006
View in Google Scholar
