Going green with artificial intelligence: The path of technological change towards the renewable energy transition

Abstract

Research background: The twin pressures of economic downturn and climate change faced by countries around the world have become more pronounced over the past decade. A renewable energy transition is believed to play a central role in mitigating the economic-climate paradox. While the architectural and computational power of artificial intelligence is particularly well suited to address the challenges of massive data processing and demand forecasting during a renewable energy transition, there is very scant empirical assessment that takes a social science perspective and explores the effects of AI development on the energy transition.

Purpose of the article: This paper aims to answer two key questions: One is, how does AI software development promote or inhibit the shift of energy consumption towards renewables? The other is, under what policy interventions does AI software development have a more positive effect on promoting renewable energy consumption?

Methods: We employ a dataset of 62 economies covering the period 2011–2020 to analyze the impact of AI software development on the energy transition, where possible confounders, including political and economic characteristics and time-invariant elements, are controlled using fixed-effects estimation along with specified covariates.

Findings & value added: AI software development can promote the energy transition towards renewables. There is suggestive evidence that the core mechanism linking such a positive relationship tends to lie in improving innovation performance in environmental monitoring rather than in green computing. Government support for R&D in renewable energy technologies is found to be significantly beneficial for harnessing the positive impact of AI software development on the energy transition. Compared to non-market-based environmental policies, market-based environmental policies have a more significant positive moderating effect on the relationship between AI software development and energy transition.

Keywords

AI software development, energy transition, innovation, environmental monitoring, environmental policy

References

1. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work. NEBR Working Paper, 24196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w24196
   View in Google Scholar
2. Al-Othman, A., Tawalbeh, M., Martis, R., Dhou, S., Orhan, M., Qasim, M., & Ghani Olabi, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence and numerical models in hybrid renewable energy systems with fuel cells: Advances and prospects. Energy Conversion and Management, 253(1), 115154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115154
   View in Google Scholar
3. Antonopoulos, I., Robu, V., Couraud, B., Kirli, D., Norbu, S., Kiprakis, A., Flynn, D., Elizondo-Gonzalez, S., & Wattam, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches to energy demand-side response: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 130, 109899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109899
   View in Google Scholar
4. Baranes, E., Jacqmin, J., & Poudou, J. (2017). Non-renewable and intermittent renewable energy sources: Friends and foes? Energy Policy, 111, 58–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.018
   View in Google Scholar
5. Berg, A., Buffie, E. F., & Zanna, L. (2018). Should we fear the robot revolution? (the correct answer is yes). Journal of Monetary Economics, 97, 117–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.05.014
   View in Google Scholar
6. Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2009). The GDP paradox. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 117–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.12.001
   View in Google Scholar
7. Biber, E. (2013). The challenge of collecting and using environmental monitoring data. Ecology and society, 18(4), 895–908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06117-180468
   View in Google Scholar
8. Bielecki, A., Ernst, S., Skrodzka, W., & Wojnicki, I. (2020). The externalities of energy production in the context of development of clean energy generation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(11), 11506–11530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07625-7
   View in Google Scholar
9. Brodny, J., Tutak, M., & Saki, S. A. (2020). Forecasting the structure of energy production from renewable energy sources and biofuels in Poland. Energies, 13(10), 2539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102539
   View in Google Scholar
10. Cheng, L., & Yu, T. (2019). A new generation of AI: A review and perspective on machine learning technologies applied to smart energy and electric power systems. International Journal of Energy Research, 43(6), 1928–1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4333
    View in Google Scholar
11. Cowls, J., Tsamados, A., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). A definition, benchmark and database of AI for social good initiatives. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(2), 111–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00296-0
    View in Google Scholar
12. Dauvergne, P. (2022). Is artificial intelligence greening global supply chains? Exposing the political economy of environmental costs. Review of International Political Economy, 29(3), 696–718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1814381
    View in Google Scholar
13. Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Hassan, R., & Escobar, O. (2020). Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 121, 283–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.019
    View in Google Scholar
14. Donis, S., Gómez, J., & Salazar, I. (2023). Economic complexity, property rights and the judicial system as drivers of eco-innovations: An analysis of OECD countries. Technovation, 128, 102868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102868
    View in Google Scholar
15. Donti, P. L., & Kolter, J. Z. (2021). Machine learning for sustainable energy systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 719–747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-020220-061831
    View in Google Scholar
16. Ebert-Uphoff, I., & Hilburn, K. (2023). The outlook for AI weather prediction. Nature, 473–474(619). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02084-9
    View in Google Scholar
17. Galaz, V., Centeno, M. A., Callahan, P. W., Causevic, A., Patterson, T., Brass, I., Baum, S., Farber, D., Fischer, J., Garcia, D., McPhearson, T., Jimenez, D., King, B., Larcey, P., & Levy, K. (2021). Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability. Technology in Society, 67, 101741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101741
    View in Google Scholar
18. Gao, L., Hiruta, Y., & Ashina, S. (2020). Promoting renewable energy through willingness to pay for transition to a low carbon society in Japan. Renewable Energy, 162, 818–830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.049
    View in Google Scholar
19. Geels, F. W. (2013). The impact of the financial–economic crisis on sustainability transitions: Financial investment, governance and public discourse. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 6, 67–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.11.004
    View in Google Scholar
20. Goh, K. H., Wang, L., Yeow, A., Poh, H., Li, K., Yeow, J., & Tan, G. (2021). Artificial intelligence in sepsis early prediction and diagnosis using unstructured data in healthcare. Nat Commun, 12(1), 711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20910-4
    View in Google Scholar
21. Goralski, M. A., & Tan, T. K. (2020). Artificial intelligence and sustainable development. International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100330
    View in Google Scholar
22. Grubler, A. (1996). Time for a change: On the patterns of diffusion of innovation. Daedalus, 125(3), 19–42.
    View in Google Scholar
23. Hajjaji, Y., Boulila, W., Farah, I. R., Romdhani, I., & Hussain, A. (2021). Big data and IoT-based applications in smart environments: A systematic review. Computer Science Review, 39, 100318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100318
    View in Google Scholar
24. Haščiči, I., & Migottoi, M. (2015). Measuring environmental innovation using patent data. OECD Environment Working Papers, 89.
    View in Google Scholar
25. Hermann, E. (2022). Leveraging artificial intelligence in marketing for social good—an ethical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(1), 43–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04843-y
    View in Google Scholar
26. Hernandez-Matheus, A., Löschenbrand, M., Berg, K., Fuchs, I., Aragüés-Peñalba, M., Bullich-Massagué, E., & Sumper, A. (2022). A systematic review of machine learning techniques related to local energy communities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 170, 112651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112651
    View in Google Scholar
27. Hino, M., Benami, E., & Brooks, N. (2018). Machine learning for environmental monitoring. Nature Sustainability, 1, 583–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0142-9
    View in Google Scholar
28. Huang, L., & Zou, Y. (2020). How to promote energy transition in China: From the perspectives of interregional relocation and environmental regulation. Energy Economics, 92, 104996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104996
    View in Google Scholar
29. Huang, X., Liu, W., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, Z. (2022). Intensive judicial oversight and corporate green innovations: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. China Economic Review, 74, 101799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101799
    View in Google Scholar
30. Huang, Z., Liao, G., & Li, Z. (2019). Loaning scale and government subsidy for promoting green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 148–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.023
    View in Google Scholar
31. Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2016). The impact of renewable energy consumption to economic growth: A panel data application. Energy Economics, 53, 58–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.003
    View in Google Scholar
32. Jha, S. K., Bilalovic, J., Jha, A., Patel, N., & Zhang, H. (2017). Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of artificial intelligence. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 297–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.018
    View in Google Scholar
33. Kopka, A., & Grashof, N. (2022). Artificial intelligence: Catalyst or barrier on the path to sustainability? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121318
    View in Google Scholar
34. Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2017). Artificial intelligence and its implications for income distribution and unemployment. NEBR Working Paper, 24174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w24174
    View in Google Scholar
35. Kumari, A., Gupta, R., Tanwar, S., & Kumar, N. (2020). Blockchain and AI amalgamation for energy cloud management: Challenges, solutions, and future directions. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 143, 148–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2020.05.004
    View in Google Scholar
36. Leal Filho, W., Wall, T., Rui Mucova, S. A., Nagy, G. J., Balogun, A., Luetz, J. M., Ng, A. W., Kovaleva, M., Safiul Azam, F. M., Alves, F., Guevara, Z., Matandirotya, N. R., Skouloudis, A., Tzachor, A., Malakar, K., & Gandhi, O. (2022). Deploying artificial intelligence for climate change adaptation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121662
    View in Google Scholar
37. Lokshin, B., Belderbos, R., & Carree, M. (2008). The productivity effects of internal and external R&D: Evidence from a dynamic panel data model. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), 399–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00503.x
    View in Google Scholar
38. Long, H., Feng, G. F., Gong, Q., & Chang, C. P. (2023). ESG performance and green innovation: An investigation based on quantile regression. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 5102–5118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3410
    View in Google Scholar
39. Luo, S., Yimamu, N., Li, Y., Wu, H., Irfan, M., & Hao, Y. (2023). Digitalization and sustainable development: How could digital economy development improve green innovation in China? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1847–1871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3223
    View in Google Scholar
40. Luttmer, E. G. J. (2012). Technology diffusion and growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 147(2), 602–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2011.02.003
    View in Google Scholar
41. Mason, K., Duggan, J., & Howley, E. (2018). Forecasting energy demand, wind generation and carbon dioxide emissions in Ireland using evolutionary neural networks. Energy, 155, 705–720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.192
    View in Google Scholar
42. Mildenberger, M., & Leiserowitz, A. (2017). Public opinion on climate change: Is there an economy-environment tradeoff? Environmental Politics, 26(5), 801–824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1322275
    View in Google Scholar
43. Obschonka, M., & Audretsch, D. B. (2020). Artificial intelligence and big data in entrepreneurship: A new era has begun. Small Business Economics, 55(3), 529–539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00202-4
    View in Google Scholar
44. Olabi, A. G. (2017). Renewable energy and energy storage systems. Energy, 136(1), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.054
    View in Google Scholar
45. Owen, A. D. (2006). Renewable energy: Externality costs as market barriers. Energy Policy, 34(5), 632–642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.017
    View in Google Scholar
46. Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 619–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1
    View in Google Scholar
47. Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2008). Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics, 145(1), 121–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.05.009
    View in Google Scholar
48. Paschen, U., Pitt, C., & Kietzmann, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence: Building blocks and an innovation typology. Business Horizons, 63(2), 147–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.10.004
    View in Google Scholar
49. Piselli, C., Salvadori, G., Diciotti, L., Fantozzi, F., & Pisello, A. L. (2021). Assessing users’ willingness-to-engagement towards Net Zero Energy communities in Italy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 152, 111627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111627
    View in Google Scholar
50. Roach, B., & Walker, T. R. (2017). Aquatic monitoring programs conducted during environmental impact assessments in Canada: Preliminary assessment before and after weakened environmental regulation. Environ Monit Assess, 189(3), 109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5823-8
    View in Google Scholar
51. Rusch, M., Schöggl, J., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2022). Application of digital technologies for sustainable product management in a circular economy: A review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(3), 1159–1174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3099
    View in Google Scholar
52. Sartori, L., & Theodorou, A. (2022). A sociotechnical perspective for the future of AI: Narratives, inequalities, and human control. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09624-3
    View in Google Scholar
53. Scruggs, L., & Benegal, S. (2012). Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession? Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 505–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002
    View in Google Scholar
54. Shin, W., Han, J., & Rhee, W. (2021). AI-assistance for predictive maintenance of renewable energy systems. Energy, 221, 119775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.119775
    View in Google Scholar
55. Stavins, R. N. (2010). Market-based environmental policies. In P. Portney & R. N. Stavins (Eds.). Public policies for environmental protection (pp. 31–76). Routledge.
    View in Google Scholar
56. Truby, J. (2020). Governing artificial intelligence to benefit the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 946–959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2048
    View in Google Scholar
57. Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S. D., Tegmark, M., & Fuso Nerini, F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11(1), 210–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y
    View in Google Scholar
58. Wang, Y., Chi, P., Nie, R., Ma, X., Wu, W., & Guo, B. (2023). A novel fractional discrete grey model with variable weight buffer operator and its applications in renewable energy prediction. Soft Computing, 27(14), 9321–9345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08203-y
    View in Google Scholar
59. Wehn, U., & Uta Almomani, A. (2019). Incentives and barriers for participation in community-based environmental monitoring and information systems: A critical analysis and integration of the literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 341–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.002
    View in Google Scholar
60. Wen, J., Yin, H., Jang, C., Uchida, H., & Chang, C. (2023). Does corruption hurt green innovation? Yes – Global evidence from cross-validation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122313
    View in Google Scholar
61. Wilson, C., & van der Velden, M. (2022). Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making. Technology in Society, 68, 101926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101926
    View in Google Scholar
62. Xia, W., Apergis, N., Bashir, M. F., Ghosh, S., Doğan, B., & Shahzad, U. (2022). Investigating the role of globalization, and energy consumption for environmental externalities: Empirical evidence from developed and developing economies. Renewable Energy, 183, 219–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.084
    View in Google Scholar
63. Xiao, X., & Li, X. (2023). A novel compositional data model for predicting the energy consumption structures of Europe, Japan, and China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(10), 11673–11698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02547-5
    View in Google Scholar
64. Yazdanpanah, M., Komendantova, N., & Ardestani, R. S. (2015). Governance of energy transition in Iran: Investigating public acceptance and willingness to use renewable energy sources through socio-psychological model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 565–573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.002
    View in Google Scholar
65. Yi, S., & Xiao-li, A. (2018). Application of threshold regression analysis to study the impact of regional technological innovation level on sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 89, 27–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.005
    View in Google Scholar
66. Yin, H., Wen, J., & Chang, C. (2022). Science-technology intermediary and innovation in China: Evidence from State Administration for Market Regulation, 2000–2019. Technology in Society, 68, 101864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101864
    View in Google Scholar
67. York, R. (2012). Asymmetric effects of economic growth and decline on CO2 emissions. Nature Climate Change, 2, 762–764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1699
    View in Google Scholar
68. Zhao, Y., Li, J., & Yu, L. (2017). A deep learning ensemble approach for crude oil price forecasting. Energy Economics, 66, 9–16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.023
    View in Google Scholar
69. Zheng, M., Feng, G. F., Jiang, R. A., & Chang, C. P. (2023). Does environmental, social, and governance performance move together with corporate green innovation in China? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1670–1679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3211
    View in Google Scholar
70. Zhou, K., Luo, H., Ye, D., & Tao, Y. (2022). The power of anti-corruption in environmental innovation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121831
    View in Google Scholar
71. Zhuang, Y., Wu, F., Chen, C., & Pan, Y. (2017). Challenges and opportunities: From big data to knowledge in AI 2.0. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 18, 3–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1601883
    View in Google Scholar
72. Zou, Y., & Wang, M. (2024). Does environmental regulation improve energy transition performance in China? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 104, 107335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107335
    View in Google Scholar