Exploring potential drivers of innovation-related activities in Poland: evidence from Polish business clusters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.027Keywords:
clusters, cooperation, innovativeness, cluster leader, cluster localization, Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling, PLS-SEMAbstract
Research background: Innovations are introduced by competitive companies. One of the most common methods, increasingly used by companies, is organizing clusters or cluster initiatives operating within a specialized sector, competing with each other, exploiting the potential of cooperation and its impact on creating new business ideas. However, these efforts could be unviable due to the lack of an effective leader of the group. One should underline a crucial role of the leader in such an organized network, since the leader makes improvements and takes initiatives for all the network and its partners. These concepts prompt us to undertake the research on the role of clusters? characteristics on enhancing willingness to innovate in general. This study aims to point out the main characteristics of clusters and to investigate their impact on companies? innovativeness. The main problem to address is the magnitude of specific effects that might boost introducing new solutions in firms? networks.
Purpose of the article: The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of factors describing cluster environment (characteristics like cooperation within clusters and beyond them, incentives of a leader, and localization factors) that might affect the innovativeness of companies.
Methods: The authors collected data using questionnaire. This type of primary source enables the authors to construct a model consisting of latent variables such as incentives of coordinator of cluster or cluster initiative, cooperation of firms with local authorities, cooperation between entrepreneurs, or localization. The results are subject to the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) analysis.
Findings & value added: The conducted analysis leads to several findings. Firstly, incentives provided by the cluster coordinator enable companies to increase the willingness to introduce innovations in general. Secondly, however, the influence of other cluster characteristics on the propensity to innovate for firms functioning within specific Polish business clusters is scant. These findings point to the fact that actions leading to assign the official coordinator of a cluster need to be done, as it should result in better flow of knowledge, more symmetric information among companies within cluster, and more productive and innovative way of functioning firms in general. Regarding innovation clusters (and regional innovation systems), these actions need to be supported by forming policy on regional level, because effective clusters would induce more competitive regional economy in long-term scenario.
Downloads
References
Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. The American Economic Review, 78(4), 678-690. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1811167
View in Google Scholar
Aghion, P., Ljungqvist, L., Howitt, P., Howitt, P. W., Brant-Collett, M., & García-Penalosa, C. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. MIT press.
View in Google Scholar
Alberti, F. G., Belfanti, F., & Giusti, J. D. (2021). Knowledge exchange and innovation in clusters: a dynamic social network analysis. Industry and Innovation, 28(7), 880?901. doi:10.1080/13662716.2021.1904840
View in Google Scholar
Andersson, T., Schwaag Serger, S., Sörvik, J., & Wise Hansson, E. (2004). The cluster policies whitebook, Malmö: IKED.
View in Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J. (1962). The economic implications of learning-by-doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155-173. doi: 10.2307/2295952.
View in Google Scholar
Asheim, B.T., Coenen, L., & Svensson?Henning, M. (2003). Nordic SMEs and regional innovation systems. Lund: Department of Social and Economic Geography, Lund University.
View in Google Scholar
Audretsch, D., Feldman M.P. (1995). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640.
View in Google Scholar
Baptista, R. (2000). Does innovation diffuse faster within geographical cluster? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 515-535. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00045-4.
View in Google Scholar
Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more?. Research Policy, 27(5), 525-540. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1.
View in Google Scholar
Beaudry, V., Breschi, S. (2003). Are firms in clusters really more innovative? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(4), 325-342. doi: 10.1080/10438590290020197.
View in Google Scholar
Bell, G. G. (2005). Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 287-295. doi:10.1002/smj.448
View in Google Scholar
Benneworth, P., & Charles, D. (2001). Bridging cluster theory and practice: learning from the cluster policy cycle. In: P. den Hertog, E.M. Bergman, & D. Charles (Eds.). Innovative clusters: drivers of national innovation systems. Paris: OECD, 32.
View in Google Scholar
Blanco-Oliver, A., Irimia-Dieguez, A., Oliver-Alfonso, M.D., and Vázquez-Cueto, M.J. (2016). Hybrid model using logit and nonparametric methods for predicting micro-entity failure. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(3), 35-46. doi:10.21511/imfi.13(3).2016.037-346.
View in Google Scholar
Bogliacino, F., & Pianta, M. (2010). Innovation and Employment: a Reinvestigation using Revised Pavitt classes. Research Policy, 39(6), 799-809. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.017
View in Google Scholar
Boschma, R. (2005) Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment, Regional Studies, 39:1, 61-74, DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
View in Google Scholar
Boschma, R. & Ter Wal, A. (2007). Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy. Industry & Innovation. 14. 177-199. doi: 10.1080/13662710701253441.
View in Google Scholar
Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (2007). Clusters, networks and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar
Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composi-tion of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2), 93?118. doi: 10.1007/BF01224915.
View in Google Scholar
Cassel, C., Hackl, P., & Westlund, A.H. (1999). Robustness of partial least squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures, Journal of Applied Statistics, 26(4), 435-446. doi: 10.1080/02664769922322.
View in Google Scholar
Cheba, K. (2015). The Influence of Clusters on Economic Development. A comparative analysis of Cluster Policy in the European Union and Japan. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(3), pp. 73-88, doi: 10. 12775/OeC.2015.022.
View in Google Scholar
Cheng, Y., Liu, Y., Fan, W., Yan, Z., & Ye, X. (2017). Triple helix on globalization: A case study of the China International Nanotech Innovation Cluster. Information Development, 35(2), 272?289. doi: 10.1177/0266666917743050
View in Google Scholar
Chun-Liang, C., Yao-Chin L., Wei-Hung, C., Xin-Si, H., (2018) "Determinants of cluster leadership and identification on cluster innovation model", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, doi: 10.1108/LODJ-10-2017-0305
View in Google Scholar
Ciccione, A., & Matsuyama, K. (1996). Start-up costs and pecuniary externalities as barriers to economic development. Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), 33-59. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(95)00052-6.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New York: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
View in Google Scholar
Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475?491. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00025-5
View in Google Scholar
Cooke, P., De Laurentis, C., & Macneil, S. (2010). Platforms of innovation. Chel-tenham: Edward Elgar.
View in Google Scholar
Corral de Zubielqui, G., Lindsay, N., Lindsay, W. (2019). Knowledge quality, innovation and firm performance: a study of knowledge transfer in SMEs. Small Bus Econ 53, 145?164. doi: 10.1007/s11187-018-0046-0
View in Google Scholar
Cotic-Svetina, A., Jaklic, M., & Prodan, I. (2008). Does collective learning in clusters contribute to innovation?. Science and Public Policy, 35(5), 335?345. doi: 10.3152/030234208X319357.
View in Google Scholar
Duranton, G., Martin, P., Mayer, T., & Mayneris, F. (2011). The economics of clusters: Lessons from the French experience. The Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 573-5.
View in Google Scholar
Darroch, J. (2005) "Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9 Issue: 3, pp.101-115, doi: 10.1108/13673270510602809
View in Google Scholar
Eisenbeiß, S. A., & Boerner, S. (2010). Transformational Leadership and R&D Innovation: Taking a Curvilinear Approach. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(4), 364?372. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.0056
View in Google Scholar
Elenkov, D., Judge, W., & Wright, P. (2005). Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: an international multi-cluster comparative study.
View in Google Scholar
Strategic Management Journal, 26, 665-682. doi: 10.1002/smj.469.
View in Google Scholar
Engel, J.S., (2015). Global clusters of innovation: lessons from silicon valley. California Management Review, 57(2), 36-65. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.36.
View in Google Scholar
Evangelista, R., & Vezzani, A. (2011). The impact of technological and organizational innovations on employment in European firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(4), 871?899. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr069
View in Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417?1435. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003
View in Google Scholar
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 110-132. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00132-1.
View in Google Scholar
Götz, M., & Jankowska, B. (2017) Clusters and Industry 4.0 ? do they fit together?, European Planning Studies, 25:9, 1633-1653, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1327037
View in Google Scholar
Grossman, G.M., & Helpman, E. (1993). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar
Hair, J.F., Jr., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (pls-sem). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
View in Google Scholar
Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D. and Winter, S.G. (2007), Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organisations, Blackwell Publishing, London.
View in Google Scholar
Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modelling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565?580. doi: 10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1.
View in Google Scholar
Jankowska, B., Götz, M. (2018). Does Innovation Trigger the Internationalisation of Clusters?: The Case of Polish Boiler-Making Cluster. In: Belussi, F., Hervas-Oliver, JL. (eds) Agglomeration and Firm Performance. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-90575-4_4
View in Google Scholar
Kaufmann, L., & Gaeckler, J. (2015). A structured review of partial least squares in supply chain management research. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21, 259-272. doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2015.04.005.
View in Google Scholar
Kurzhals, C, Graf-Vlachy, L, König, A. Strategic leadership and technological innovation: A comprehensive review and research agenda. Corp Govern Int Rev. 2020; 28: 437? 464. doi: 10.1111/corg.12351
View in Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of
View in Google Scholar
Political Economy, 99, 483-499. doi: 10.1086/261763.
View in Google Scholar
Kuksa, I. ., Shtuler, I., Orlova-Kurilova, O. ., Hnatenko, I., & Rubezhanska, V. (2019). INNOVATION CLUSTER AS A MECHANISM FOR ENSURING THE ENTERPRISES INTERACTION IN THE INNOVATION SPHERE. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 41(4), 487?500. doi: 10.15544/mts.2019.39
View in Google Scholar
Lundvall, B.A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
View in Google Scholar
MacNeill, S., & Steiner, M. (2010). Leadership of cluster policy: lessons from the austrian province of styria. Policy Studies, 31(4), 441-455. doi: 10.1080/01442871003723374.
View in Google Scholar
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247?264. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00139-1 Marquis, D., & Myers, S. (1969). Successful industrial innovation. Washington: National Science Fundation.
View in Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.
View in Google Scholar
Mazzoni, F. 2020. Circular economy and eco-innovation in Italian industrial clusters. Best practices from Prato textile cluster, Insights into Regional Development 2(3): 661-676. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2020.2.3(4)
View in Google Scholar
Mensch, G. (1979). Stalemate in technology: innovations overcome the depression. Cambridge: Ballinger.
View in Google Scholar
Müller-Seitz, G. (2012). Leadership in interorganizational networks: a literature review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 428?443. doi: /10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00324.x.
View in Google Scholar
Necoechea-Mondragón, H., Pineda-Domínguez, D., Pérez-Reveles, L., & Soto-Flores, R. (2017). Critical factors for participation in global innovation networks. Empirical evidence from the Mexican nanotechnology sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 293?312. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.027
View in Google Scholar
Nj?s, R., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2016). Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 146?169. doi:10.1080/21681376.2015.1138094
View in Google Scholar
Nobre, F.S., Walker, D. and Harris, R. (2011), Technological, Managerial and Organizational Core Competencies: Dynamic Innovation and Sustainable Development, IGI Global, Hershey, PA.
View in Google Scholar
Niosi, J. (2012). Innovation and development through imitation (in praise of imitation). Presented to the meeting of the International Schumpeter So-ciety. Brisbane, Australia.
View in Google Scholar
OECD (2005). Oslo manual. guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Oslo: OECD. Doi: 10.1787/9789264013100-en.
View in Google Scholar
Pag?s, J., Tenenhaus, M., (2001). Multiple factor analysis combined with pls path modelling. application to the analysis of relationships between physicochemical variables, sensory profiles and hedonic judgements. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 58, 261-273. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00165-4
View in Google Scholar
Pan, X., Song, M. L., Zhang, J., & Zhou, G. (2018). Innovation network, technological learning and innovation performance of high-tech cluster enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management. doi:10.1108/jkm-06-2018-0371.
View in Google Scholar
Pieterse, A. N., van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2009). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609?623. doi:10.1002/job.650
View in Google Scholar
Porter, M.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.
View in Google Scholar
Porter, M.E. (1998). Clusters and new economics of competition. Boston: Harvard Business Review.
View in Google Scholar
Pouwels, I. and Koster, F. (2017), "Inter-organizational cooperation and organizational innovativeness. A comparative study", International Journal of Innovation Science, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 184-204. doi: 10.1108/IJIS-01-2017-0003
View in Google Scholar
Pucci, T., Brumana, M., Minola, T. (2020). Social capital and innovation in a life science cluster: the role of proximity and family involvement. J Technol Transf 45, 205?227. doi: 10.1007/s10961-017-9591-y
View in Google Scholar
RADICIC, D., DOUGLAS, D., PUGH, G., & JACKSON, I. (2018). COOPERATION FOR INNOVATION AND ITS IMPACT ON TECHNOLOGICAL AND NON-TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR EUROPEAN SMES IN TRADITIONAL MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES. International Journal of Innovation Management, 1950046. doi:10.1142/s1363919619500464
View in Google Scholar
Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based sem, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332-344. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001.
View in Google Scholar
Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., & Becker J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com.
View in Google Scholar
Rodriges-Clare, A. (1996). The division of labour and economic development. Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), 3-32. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(95)00051-8.
View in Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (1982) Inside the Black Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511611940
View in Google Scholar
Rosenthal, S.S., & Strange, W.C. (2003). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. Handbook of Urban and Regional Economies, 4.
View in Google Scholar
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Smith, D., Reams, R. & Hair Jr, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem): a useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002.
View in Google Scholar
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2020). Structural model robustness checks in pls-sem. Tourism Economics, 26(4), 531?554. doi: 10.1177/1354816618823921.
View in Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
View in Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1951). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
View in Google Scholar
Silvestre, B. S., & Ţîrcă, D. M. (2019). Innovations for sustainable development: Moving toward a sustainable future. Journal of cleaner production, 208, 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.244
View in Google Scholar
Stock, R. M., Totzauer, F., & Zacharias, N. A. (2013). A Closer Look at Cross-functional R&D Cooperation for Innovativeness: Innovation-oriented Leadership and Human Resource Practices as Driving Forces. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 924?938. doi:10.1111/jpim.12132
View in Google Scholar
Stojčić, N., Anić, I-D., Aralica, Z., (2019). Do firms in clusters perform better? Lessons from wood-processing industries in new EU member states, For-est Policy and Economics, Volume 109. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102043.
View in Google Scholar
Sullivan, H., Williams, P., & Jeffares, S. (2012). Leadership for collaboration. Public Management Review, 14(1), 41-66. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2011.589617.
View in Google Scholar
Varis, M., & Littunen, H. (2010). Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 128?154. doi:10.1108/14601061011040221
View in Google Scholar
Weber, A. (1909). Theory of the location of industries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
View in Google Scholar
Y?ld?z, S., Baştürk, F., & Boz, ?. T. (2014). The Effect of Leadership and Innova-tiveness on Business Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavior-al Sciences, 150, 785?793. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.064.
View in Google Scholar
