Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Does trade openness improve the quality of domestic institutions? Evidence from Africa

Abstract

Research background: The research article deals with impacts of international trade openness on institutions in less developed economies, namely in Africa.

Purpose of the article: It investigates the impacts of international trade openness on institutional quality in Africa measured by twelve various variables.

Methods: It applies generalized methods of moments to a dynamic panel data of 34 African countries in the period of 1988?2012. Institutional quality data come from International Country Risk Guide, the rest from World Development Indicators and UNESCO databases.

Findings & value added: Our results indicate that in the case of Africa, trade openness seems to be a positive and significant determinant of institutional quality, however, it differs across various institutional variables. Trade openness brings a positive impact on government stability, bureaucracy and law and order, we also identify its conflict-mitigating effects. This happens, unfortunately, with an exemption for natural resources exports. Trade openness also positively influences security and socioeconomic conditions, although we find the link much weaker. Regarding our control variables, we find two interesting results. First, GDP per capita has a strong and positive association with institutional quality when measured by one bundled indicator, however, individual variables show different intensities. Second, we find a strong and positive association of net foreign direct investment inflows and government stability. The added value of this research lies not only in focus on the less researched relationship, i.e., how trade impacts the institutional quality, but dominantly in focus on many institutional variables at once and comparison of their effects. Other empirical studies usually focus on selected variables only, or on selected trade items (natural resources).

Keywords

international trade, trade openness, quality of institutions, Arica, panel data models, socio-economic development

PDF

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2006). Economic backwardness in political perspec-tive. American Political Science Review, 100(1), 115?131. doi: 10.1017/S0 003055406062046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062046
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Adams, S., & Opoku, E. E. O. (2015). Foreign direct investment, regulations, and growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Analysis and Policy, 47(C), 48?56. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2015.07.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2015.07.001
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Alonso, J. A., & Garcimartín, C. (2013). The determinant of institutional quality. More on the debate. Journal of International Development, 25, 206?226. doi: 10.1002/jid.1710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1710
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Álvárez, I. C., Barbero, J., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Zofío, J. (2018) Does institutional quality matter for trade? Institutional conditions in a sectoral trade framework. World Development, 103, 72?87. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10 .010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.010
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. E., & Marcoullier, M. (2002). Insecurity and the pattern of trade: an empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 342?352. doi: 10.1162/003465302317411587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317411587
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, J. E. (2008). Does trade foster contract enforcement? Economic Theory, 41(1), 105?130. doi: 10.1007/s00199-008-0378-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0378-0
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277?297. doi: 10.2307/2297968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Arshavskiy, A. (2019). Institutions and comparative advantage in services trade. Leibnitz Information Centre for Economics. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle. net/11159/4031.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Asongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2016). Foreign aid and governance in Africa. International Review of Applied Economics, 30(1), 69?88. doi: 10.1080/0269 2171.2015.1074164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2015.1074164
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Bengoa, M., & Sanchez-Robles, B. (2003). Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and growth: new evidence from Latin America. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 529?545. doi: 10.1016/S0176-2680(03)00011-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(03)00011-9
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Berman, H. (1983). Law and revolution: the formation of the Western legal tradi-tion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Berman, N., & Couttenier, M. (2014). External shocks, internal shots: the geogra-phy of civil conflicts. CEPR Discussion Paper, 9895.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Bah, M., Ondoa, H., & Kpognon, K. D. (2021). Effects of governance on exports in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Economics, 167, 1?14. doi: 10.1016/j.inteco. 2021.05.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2021.05.003
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Bhagwati, J., & Srinivasan, T. N. (2002). Trade and poverty in the poor countries. American Economic Review, 92(2), 80?183. doi: 10.1257/000282802320189 212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320189212
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Bhattacharya, P., & Thomakos, D. (2007). Trade, openness, and domestic con-flict: an empirical investigation for Latin America. Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 2(2), 77?80. doi: 10.15355/epsj.2.2.77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.2.2.77
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dy-namic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115?143. doi: 10.101 6/S0304-4076(98)00009-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Bond, S., Hoeffler, A., & Tample, J. (2001). GMM estimation of empirical growth models. Oxford: University of Oxford.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Borrmann, A., Busse, M., & Neuhaus, S. (2006). Institutional quality and gains from trade. Kyklos, 59(3), 345?368. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.895242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00336.x
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Boxell, L., Dalton, J., & Leung, T. (2019). Slave trade and conflict in Africa 1400-2000. MPRA Paper, 94468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3403796
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Cali, M. (2015). Trading away from conflict, using trade to increase resilience in fragile states. Washington: The World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0308-6
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Candau, F., & Gbandi, T. (2019). Trade and institutions: explaining urban giants. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(6), 1017?1035. doi: 10.1017/S1744137 419000328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137419000328
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Castilho, M., Menéndez, M. & Sztulman, A. (2012). Trade liberalisation, inequality and poverty in Brazilian states. World Development, 40(4), 821?835. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.018
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Chan, K. S. (2002). Trade and bureaucratic efficiency. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50(3), 735?754. doi: 10.1086/342248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/342248
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Chong, A. (2001). Law tradition and institutional quality: some empirical evi-dence. Journal of International Development, 12(8), 1057?1068. doi: 10.1002/jid.681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.681
    View in Google Scholar
  25. De Groot, H., Linders, G.-J., & Rietveld, P. (2003). The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Tinbergen Institute Working Paper, 03-044/3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.417323
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Dutt, P. (2009). Trade protection and bureaucratic corruption: an empirical inves-tigation. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d`Economique, 42(1), 155?183. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01503.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01503.x
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Epo, B. N., & Faha, D. R. N. (2020). Natural resources, institutional quality, and economic growth: an African tale. European Journal of Development Re-search, 32(1), 99?128. doi: 10.1057/s41287-019-00222-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-019-00222-6
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Fauzel, S. (2020). Investigating the impact of trade on poverty reduction in a small island economy. Forum for Social Economics, 51(4), 433?452. doi: 10.1080/0 7360932.2020.1811746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2020.1811746
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Feeny, S., Iamsiraroj, S., & McGillivray, M. (2014). Growth and foreign direct in-vestment in the Pacific Island countries. Economic Modelling, 37, 332?339. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.11.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.11.018
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Frensch, R., Horvath, R., & Huber, S. (2021). Openness effects on the rule of law: size and patterns of trade. International Review of Law and Economics, 68, 106027. doi: 10.1016/j.irle.2021.106027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2021.106027
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Gani, A. (2007). Governance and foreign direct investment links: evidence from panel data estimations. Applied Economics Letters, 14(10), 753?756. doi: 10.10 80/13504850600592598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850600592598
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Garfinkel, M. F., Skaperdas, S., & Syropoulos, C. (2008). Globalisation and domes-tic conflict. Journal of International Economics, 76(2), 296?308. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.07.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.07.005
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Gatti, R. (2004). Explaining corruption: are open countries less corrupt? Journal of International Development, 16(6), 851?861. doi: 10.1002/jid.1115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1115
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Gori, O. D, Kun F., & Wilfred, D. (2018). Institutional quality and economic devel-opment in Sub-Saharan Africa: can management effort and bribes compen-sate for low-quality institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 52(2), 473?482. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2018.1469920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2018.1469920
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Gui-Diby, S. L. (2014). Impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth in Africa: evidence from three decades of panel data analyses. Research in Economics, 68(3), 248?256. doi: 10.1016/j.rie.2014.04.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2014.04.003
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Hochman, G., Tabakis, C., & Zilberman, D. (2013). The impact of international trade on institutions and infrastructure. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(1), 126?140. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2012.07.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.07.001
    View in Google Scholar
  37. ICRG (2020). Country data. The PRS Group. Retrieved from https://www.prsgr oup.com/explore-our-products/icrg/.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. ICRG (2022). The ICRG methodology. The PRS Group. Retrieved from https://www.prsgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/ICRG-Method.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Iheonu, Ch. I., & Chigozie, G. O. (2017). Institutional quality and economic per-formance in West Africa. MRPA Paper, 82212.
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Inikori, J. E. (2002). African and the industrial revolution in England: a study in international trade and economic development. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583940
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Islam, R., & Montenegro (2002). World development report: building institutions for markets. Washington: The World Bank.
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Islam, R., & Montenegro, C. (2002). What determines the quality of institutions? Background paper for World Development Report 2002. Washington: World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2764
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Kamel, A. (2016). Trade and peace: the EU and Gaddafi?s final decade. International Affairs, 92, 683?702. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12602
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Kim, S., & Park, S. Ch. (2020). Institutional quality, trade costs and comparative advantage. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy Working Paper, 19-06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3700740
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Kopperschmidt, A., & Jacint, M. (1997). Assessment of trade liberalization in Sub-Saharan Africa. Intereconomics, 32(4), 193?202. doi: 10.1007/BF02928434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02928434
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Krueger, A. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, 64(3), 291?303.
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Kunčič, A. (2014). Institutional quality dataset. Journal of Institutional Econom-ics, 10(1), 135?161. doi: 10.1017/S1744137413000192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137413000192
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Kwakwa, P. A., Adzawla, W., Alhassan, H., & Achaamah, A. (2021). Natural re-sources and economic growth: does political regime matter for Tunisia? Jour-nal of Public Affairs, 22(S1), e2707. doi: 10.1002/pa.2707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2707
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Lee, K. K. (2014). Globalisation, income inequality and poverty: theory and empir-ics. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/60545338.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Levchenko, A. (2007). Institutional quality and international trade. Review of Economic Studies, 74(3), 791?819. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00435.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00435.x
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Levchenko, A. (2016). The impact of trade openness on institutions. World Devel-opment Report. Working Paper. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/26214
    View in Google Scholar
  52. López-Córdova, J., & Meissner, C. (2008). The impact of international trade on democracy: a long-run perspective. World Politics, 60(4), 539?575. doi: 10.135 3/wp.0.0016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.0.0016
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Majeed, M. T. (2014). Corruption and trade. Journal of Economic Integration, 29(4), 759?782. doi: 10.11130/jei.2014.29.4.759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2014.29.4.759
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Martin, P. Mayer, T., & Thoenig, M. (2008). Make trade not war? Review of Economic Studies, 75(3), 865?900. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00492.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00492.x
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Maystadt, J.-F., De Luca, G., Sekeris, P. G., Ulimwengu, J., & Folledo, R. (2014). Mineral resources and conflicts in DRC: a case of ecological fallacy? Oxford Economic Papers, 66(3), 721?749. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpt037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpt037
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Mlambo, C., & Borz, G. (2022). Politics and natural resources curse: evidence from selected African states. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2035911. doi: 10.10 80/23311886.2022.2035911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2035911
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Mulwa, R., & Mariara, J. (2016). Natural resource curse in Africa: Dutch disease and institutional explanations. International Food Policy Research Institute. Working Paper. Retrieved from https://www.ifpri.org/publication/natural-resource-curse-africa-dutch-disease-and-institutional-explanations.
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Nicolini, M. (2011). On the evolution of institutional comparative advantages. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 22(2), 162?172. doi: 10.1016/j.st rueco.2010.12.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2010.12.003
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Nihal, M., Mohammad, H. S., Ishaq, M. A., & Mashiyat, T. (2019). Foreign direct investment and institutional quality: who drives who? Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 24(47), 145?156. doi: 10.1108/JEFAS-05-2018-0048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-05-2018-0048
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Nunn, N., & Trefler, D. (2014). Domestic institutions as a source of comparative advantage. In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, & K. Rogof (eds). Handbook of inter-national economics (pp. 263?315). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00005-7
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Nunn, N., & Wantchekon, L. (2011). The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. American Economic Review, 101(7), 3221?3252. doi: 10.1257/aer.101 .7.3221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.7.3221
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Ploeg, F. (2007). Africa and natural resources: managing natural resources for sustainable growth. Background paper for the African Development Bank re-port. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1814/42392.
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Reale, F. (2019). Comparative institutional advantage: an obituary. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(4), 569?578. doi: 10.1017/S1744137418000474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137418000474
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Rigobon, R., & Rodrik, D. (2004). Rule of law, democracy, openness, and income: estimating the interrelationships. NBER Working Paper, 10750. doi: 10.3386/w 10750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w10750
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Robinson, J. A., Torvik, R., & Verdier, T. (2006). Political foundations of the re-source curse. Journal of Development Economics, 79(2), 447?468. doi: 10.1016 /j.jdeveco.2006.01.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.01.008
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131?165. doi: 10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.7224 8.85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86?136. doi: 10.1177/1536867X0900900106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Sala-i-Martin, X., & Subramanian, A. (2012). Addressing the natural curse: an Illustration from Nigeria. Journal of African Economies, 22(4), 570?615. doi: 10.1093/jae/ejs033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejs033
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Suzuki, Y., & Gokcekus, O. (2013). Trade with the EU reduce corruption in Africa? Journal of Economic Integration, 28(4), 610?631. doi: 10.11130/jei.2013 .28.4.610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2013.28.4.610
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Osei, D. B., Sare, Y. A., & Ibrahim, M. (2019). On the determinants of trade open-ness in low- and lower-middle-income countries in Africa: how important is economic growth? Future Business Journal, 5, 2. doi: 10.1186/s43093-019-0002-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-019-0002-8
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Topalova, P. (2007). Trade liberalization, poverty and inequality: evidence from Indian districts. In A. Harrison (Ed.). Globalisation and poverty. Chicago: Uni-versity of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226318004.003.0008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226318004.003.0008
    View in Google Scholar
  72. UIS (2020). Retrieved from http://data.uis.unesco.org/ (20.2.2020).
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Usman, K. (2011). Does trade openness affect institutional quality? Lund Univer-sity.
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Yang, J. (2020). The effect of international trade on rule of law. Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, 17(1), 27?53. doi: 10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2013.17. 1.258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2013.17.1.258
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Yushi, J., & Borojo, D. (2019). The impacts of institutional quality and infrastruc-ture on overall and intra-African trade. Economics, 13(1), 20190010. doi: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2019-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2019-10
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Wandeda, D., Masai, W., & Nyandemo, S. (2021). Institutional quality and eco-nomic growth: evidence from Sub-Saharan African countries. African Journal of Economic Review, 9(4), 106?125.
    View in Google Scholar
  77. WDI (2020). World development indicators. Retrieved from https://databank. worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (20.2.2020).
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 504

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.