E-customer preferences on sustainable last mile deliveries in the e-commerce market: A cross-generational perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.027Keywords:
e-commerce, e-customer, sustainable last mile delivery, generations, correspondence analysisAbstract
Research background: In the last few years, e-commerce market has increased in population shares, but the situation has changed dramatically since the Covid-19 pandemic. Electronic marketplaces have changed due to rapid digitalization and shopping. Online services offer the possibility to choose a different delivery method such as home delivery or out-of-home delivery. This aspect of the e-commerce market faces an increased interest among practitioners and academia in the field of sustainable last mile deliveries. Interestingly, the subject literature consists of papers analyzing the e-commerce impact on the last-mile delivery. However, the identification of factors for choosing a delivery method and factors that motivate e-customers to choose an eco-friendly delivery method is still an unrecognized field of research.
Purpose of the article: The authors of the paper focused on the e-customer perspective on sustainable deliveries in cities. Thus, the main purpose of the paper is to compare factors among the generations that motivate e-customers for choosing a delivery method.
Methods: The research was conducted among 1.110 e-customers in Poland in 2021. The paper aims to answer the following research question: what factors motivate each generation for choosing a delivery method? To answer the above-mentioned question, the correspondence analysis (MCA) is prepared that help to identify and compare factors in each generation.
Findings & value added: The original research procedure focused on the use of multivariate statistical methods in the study of e-customers’ preferences. The analysis revealed three clusters of e-customers in terms of pro-sustainable factors: (a) aged 65+ without pro-sustainable tendency, (b) aged 18–64 with pro-sustainable attitudes, and (c) mixed with no identified delivery preferences. As a result of the research, it can be concluded that the parcel price and the possibility of free return are still the most important factors in choosing the delivery method. From a business/practical perspective, the research results can be used by companies that are the main stakeholders in last mile deliveries, including mainly forwarders and transport companies.
Downloads
References
Accenture (2021). The sustainable last mile. Sustainable Last Mile Delivery. Retrieved form https://www.accenture.com/gb-en/insights/consulting/sustainable-last-mile-delivery (07.07.2022).
View in Google Scholar
Agatz, N., Campbell, A. M.., Fleischmann, M., & Savelsbergh, M. (2008). Challenges and opportunities in attended home delivery. In B. Golden, R. Raghavan & E. Wasil (Eds.). The vehicle routing problem: Latest advances and new challenges (pp. 370–396). Springer-Verlag.
View in Google Scholar
Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries, Sustainability Science, 13, 1453–1467.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0572-3
View in Google Scholar
Bąk, I, Cheba, K., & Szczecińska B. (2019). The impact of transport on the quality of the environment in cities of Poland – A statistical analysis. Transportation Research Procedia, 39, 24–33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.004
View in Google Scholar
Beh, E. J., & Lombardo, R. (2014). Correspondence analysis: theory, practice and new strategies. John Wiley & Sons.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118762875
View in Google Scholar
Belas, J., Gavurova, B., Čepel, M., & Kubák, M. (2020). Evaluation of economic potential of business environment development by comparing sector differences: Perspective of SMEs in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Oeconomia Copernicana. 11(1), 135–159.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.006
View in Google Scholar
Benson, E. L., & Connell, K. Y. (2014). Fair trade consumption from the perspective of US Baby Boomers. Social Responsibility Journal, 10, 364–382.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2012-0094
View in Google Scholar
Bezerra, B. S., dos Santos, A. L., & Delmônico, D. V. (2020). Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil. Transportation Research Part A-policy and Practice, 132, 808–822.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.006
View in Google Scholar
Boruchowicz, C. (2022). Public policy, the environment, and the use of green nudges. In R. Fike, S. Haeffele & J. Arielle. (Eds.). Nudging public policy. examining the benefits and limitations of paternalistic public policies (pp. 175–202). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
View in Google Scholar
Cárdenas, I., Beckers, J., & Vanelslander, T. (2017). E-commerce last-mile in Belgium: Developing an external cost delivery index. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 24, 123–129.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.07.006
View in Google Scholar
Caspersen, E., & Navrud, S. (2021). The sharing economy and consumer preferences for environmentally sustainable last mile deliveries. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 95, 102863.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102863
View in Google Scholar
Castelo A. F. M., Schäfer M., & Silva M. E. (2021). Food practices as part of daily routines: A conceptual framework for analysing networks of practices. Appetite, 157, 104978, 1–12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104978
View in Google Scholar
Cheba, K., Kiba-Janiak, M., Baraniecka, A., & Kołakowski, T. (2021). Impact of external factors on the e-commerce market in cities and its implications on the environment. Sustainable Cities and Society, 72, 103032, 1–15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103032
View in Google Scholar
Comi, A. (2020). A modelling framework to forecast urban goods flows. Research in Transportation Economics, 80, 100827.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100827
View in Google Scholar
Cudeck, R. (2000). Exploratory factor analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.). Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 265–296). Academic Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50011-2
View in Google Scholar
Dabija, D. C., Bejan, B. M., & Dinu, V. (2019). How sustainability-oriented is generation Z in retail? A literature review. Transformations in Business & Economics, 18, 140–55.
View in Google Scholar
Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 465–480.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00241-7
View in Google Scholar
Dinner, I., Johnson, E. J., Goldstein, D. G., & Liu, K. (2011). Partitioning default effects: Why people choose not to choose. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(4), 432.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026470
View in Google Scholar
Ducarme, D. (2019). Sustainable solutions for “last mile” deliveries in the parcel industry: A qualitative analysis using insights from third-party logistics service providers and public mobility experts. Louvain: Louvain School of Management, Universithe catholique de Louvain.
View in Google Scholar
E-commerce share of total retail sales. (2021). EMarketer
View in Google Scholar
Evans, D. (2012). Beyond the throwaway society: Ordinary domestic practice and a sociological approach to household food waste. Sociology, 46(1), 41–56.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511416150
View in Google Scholar
Evans, D., McMeekin, A., & Southerton, D. (2012). Sustainable consumption, behaviour change policies and theories of practice. COLLeGIUM: Studies across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences, 12, 113–129.
View in Google Scholar
Evans, N., Eickers, S., Geene, L., Todorović, M., & Villmow, A. (2017). Green nudging: A discussion and preliminary evaluation of nudging as an environmental policy instrument. Environmental Policy Research Centre, Freie Universität Berlin, Retrieved from https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/fub188/ 22047/EansxEickerxGeenexTodorovicxVillmov_FFUxReport_GreenxNudging.pdf?squen-ce=1.
View in Google Scholar
Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2011). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199734177.001.0001
View in Google Scholar
Frankowska, M., & Cheba, K. (2022). The relational embeddedness as the differentiator of the cluster supply chain collaboration – A multidimensional comparative analysis. Competitiveness Review, 32(1), 59–84.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-11-2019-0114
View in Google Scholar
Gawor, T., & Hoberg, K. (2019). Customers’ valuation of time and convenience in e-fulfillment. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(1), 75–98.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-09-2017-0275
View in Google Scholar
Gevaers, R., Vanelslander, T., & Van de Voorde, E. (2011). Characteristics and typology of last-mile logistics from an innovation perspective in an urban context, city distribution and urban freight transport: multiple perspectives. In City distribution and urban freight transport: Multiple perspectives (pp. 56–71). Edward Elgar Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857932754.00009
View in Google Scholar
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/586910
View in Google Scholar
Greenacre, M. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.
View in Google Scholar
Greenacre, M. (2017). Correspondence analysis in practice. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315369983
View in Google Scholar
Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practicing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 79–99.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510390500
View in Google Scholar
Hedin, B., Katzeff, C., Eriksson, E., & Pargman, D.S. (2019). A systematic review of digital behaviour change interventions for more sustainable food consumption. Sustainability 11(9), 2638.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092638
View in Google Scholar
Hischier, R. (2018). Car vs. packaging - A first, simple (environmental) sustainability assessment of our changing shopping behaviour. Sustainability, 10, 3061.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093061
View in Google Scholar
Hursh, D. W., Henderson, J. A., & Greenwood, D. A. (2015). Environmental education in a neoliberal climate. Environmental Education Research, 21, 299–318.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1018141
View in Google Scholar
Ignat, B., & Chankov, S. (2020). Do e-commerce customers change their preferred last-mile delivery based on its sustainability impact? International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(3), 521–548.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2019-0305
View in Google Scholar
Ivanova, O., Flores‐Zamora, J., Khelladi, I., & Ivanaj, S. (2019). The generational cohort effect in the context of responsible consumption. Management Decision, 57, 1162–1183.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2016-0915
View in Google Scholar
Iwan, S., Allesch, J., Celebi, D., Kijewska, K., Hoé, M., Klauenberg, J., Zajicek, J., (2019). Electric mobility in European urban freight and logistics – Status and attempts of improvement. Transportation Research Procedia, 39, 112–123.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.013
View in Google Scholar
Iwan, S., Kijewska, K., & Lemke, J. (2016). Analysis of parcel lockers’ efficiency as the last mile delivery solution – The results of research in Poland. Transportation Research Procedia 12, 644–655.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.018
View in Google Scholar
Jain, V., Vatsa R., & Jagani K. (2014). Exploring generation Z’s purchase behavior towards luxury apparel: a conceptual framework. Romanian Journal of Marketing 2, 18–29.
View in Google Scholar
Jara, M., Vyt, D., Mevel, O., Morvan, T., & Morvan, N. (2018). Measuring customers’ benefits of click and collect. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(4), 430–442.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-05-2017-0158
View in Google Scholar
Jones, P., Comfort D., & Hillier D.(2005). Corporate social responsibility as a means of marketing to and communicating with customers within stores: A case study of UK food retailers. Management Research News, 28, 47–56.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170510785011
View in Google Scholar
Kalmus V, Keller M, & Kiisel M. (2009). Emerging consumer types in a transition culture: Consumption patterns of generational and ethnic groups in Estonia. Journal of Baltic Studies, 40(1), 53–74.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770902722252
View in Google Scholar
Kawa, A. (2020). Out-of-home delivery as a solution of the last mile problem in e-commerce. In P. Golinska-Dawson, K. M. Tsai & M. Kosacka-Olejnik (Eds.). Smart and sustainable supply chain and logistics – trends, challenges, methods and best practices (pp. 25–40). Cham: Springer.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61947-3_2
View in Google Scholar
Kiba-Janiak, M., Cheba, K., Mucowska, M., & de Oliveira, L. K. (2022). Segmentation of e-customers in terms of sustainable last-mile delivery. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1117–1142.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.032
View in Google Scholar
Kiba-Janiak, M., Marcinkowski, J., Jagoda, A., & Skorwońska, A. (2021). Sustainable last mile delivery on the e-commerce market in cities from the perspective of various stakeholders. Literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 71, 102984.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102984
View in Google Scholar
Kłeczek, R., Pluta-Olearnik, M., & Pukas, A. (2020). Transformation of urban mobility practices. Services and values, routines and innovation. Wrocław: Publishing house of the Wrocław University of Economics and Business.
View in Google Scholar
Kline, R. (2013). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In Y. Petscher, C. Schatschneider & D. L. Compton (Eds.). Applied quantitative analysis in education and the social sciences (pp. 171–207). Routledge.
View in Google Scholar
Kong, H. M., Witmaier, A., & Ko, E. (2021). Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands. Journal of Business Research, 131, 640–651.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.021
View in Google Scholar
Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Harris, L. C., & Piercy, N. (2013). Principles of marketing. Pearson Education Limited.
View in Google Scholar
Laghaei, J., Faghri, A., & Li, M. (2016). Impacts of home shopping on vehicle operations and greenhouse gas emissions: Multi-year regional study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 23, 381–391.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1124471
View in Google Scholar
Liu, G. (2014), Development of a general sustainability indicator for renewable energy systems: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, 611–621.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.038
View in Google Scholar
Lu, S., Yang, L., Liu, W., & Jia, L. (2020). User preference for electronic commerce overpackaging solutions: Implications for cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120936.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120936
View in Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. (1952). Historicism. Essays on the sociology of knowledge. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
View in Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (2014). Factor analysis and related methods. Psychology Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315802510
View in Google Scholar
McKinsey & Company (2016). Parcel delivery. The future of last mile. Travel, Transport and Logistics, September 2016. Retrieved form https://www.bringg. com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Parcel_deliveryThe_future_of_last_mile-1.pdf (01.07.2022).
View in Google Scholar
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science: IS, 6, 42–42.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
View in Google Scholar
Moroz, M., & Polkowski, Z. (2016). The last mile issue and urban logistics: Choosing parcel machines in the context of the ecological attitudes of the Y generation consumers purchasing online. Transportation Research Procedia, 16, 378–393.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.036
View in Google Scholar
Morrison, P. S., & Beer, B. (2017). Consumption and environmental awareness: Demographics of the European experience. Socioeconomic Environment Policies and Evaluations in Regional Science, 24, 81–102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0099-7_5
View in Google Scholar
Muñoz-Villamizar A., J. Santos, J. R., Montoya-Torres, J. C., Velázquez-Martínez (2020). Measuring environmental performance of urban freight transport systems: A case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101844.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101844
View in Google Scholar
Nagatsu, M. (2015). Social nudges: Their mechanisms and justification. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 481–494.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0245-4
View in Google Scholar
Nguyen, D. H., de Leeuw, S., Dullaert, W., & Foubert, B. P. J. (2019). What is the right delivery option for you? Consumer preferences for delivery attributes in online retailing. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(4), 299–321.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12210
View in Google Scholar
Paddock, J. (2017). Household consumption and environmental change: Rethinking the policy problem through narratives of food practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(1), 122–139.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540515586869
View in Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, M., Papasolomou, I., & Thrassou, A. (2021). Exploring the level of sustainability awareness among consumers within the fast-fashion clothing industry: A dual business and consumer perspective. Competitiveness Review, 32(3), 350–375
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-04-2021-0061
View in Google Scholar
Parry, E., & Battista, V. (2019). Generation Z in the UK: More of the same – High standards and demands. In C. Scholz, & A. Rennig (Eds.). Generation Z in Europe (The changing context of managing people) (pp. 89–107). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-491-120191013
View in Google Scholar
Pellizzoni, L. (2011). Governing through disorder: Neoliberal environmental governance and social theory. Global Environmental Change, 21, 795–803.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.014
View in Google Scholar
Pichert, D., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2008). Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 63–73.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.004
View in Google Scholar
Prandtstetter, M., Seragiotto, C., Braith, J., Eitler, S., Ennser, B., Hauger, G., Hohenecker, N., Schodl, R., & Steinbauer, M. (2021). On the impact of open parcel lockers on traffic. Sustainability, 13(2), 755.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020755
View in Google Scholar
Rai, H. B., Verlinde, S., & Macharis, C. (2019). The next day, free delivery myth unravelled. Possibilities for sustainable last mile transport in an omnichannel environment. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 47(1), 39–54.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-06-2018-0104
View in Google Scholar
Ranieri, L., Digiesi, S., Silvestri, B., & Roccotelli, M. (2018). A review of last mile logistics innovations in an externalities cost reduction vision. Sustainability, 10(3), 782.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030782
View in Google Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
View in Google Scholar
Rosal, I. D. (2016). Factors influencing the choice of delivery terms used in Spanish seaborne container trade. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 8(3), 318–333.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2016.076261
View in Google Scholar
Schubert, Ch. (2017). Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical? Ecological Economics, 132, 329–342.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.009
View in Google Scholar
Severo, E. A, De Guimarães, J. C. F., & Dorion, E. C. H. (2018). Cleaner production, social responsibility and eco-innovation: Generations' perception for a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 91–103.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.129
View in Google Scholar
Shove, E., & Pantzar M. (2005). Consumers, producers and practices. Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. Journal of Consumer Culture 5(1), 43–64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505049846
View in Google Scholar
Shove, E., & Walker G. (2010). Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy, 39, 471–476.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019
View in Google Scholar
Smagacz-Poziemska, M., Bukowski, A, & Martini, N. (2020). Social practice research in practice. Some methodological challenges in applying practice-based approach to the urban research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(1), 65–78.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1760577
View in Google Scholar
Southerton, D., Warde, A., & Hand M. (2004). The limited autonomy of the consumer: Implications for sustainable consumption. In D. Southerton, H. Chappells & B. Van Vliet (Eds.). Sustainable consumption: The implications of changing infrastructures of provision (pp. 32–48). London: Edward Elgar.
View in Google Scholar
Spotswood, F., Chatterton T., Tapp A., & Williams D. (2015). Analysing cycling as a social practice: An empirical grounding for behaviour change. Transportation Research, Part F:Ttraffic Psychology and Behaviour, 29, 22–33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.12.001
View in Google Scholar
Statista (2020). Last mile logistics worldwide. https://www.statista.com/study/ 49682/last-mile-delivery/.32–48.
View in Google Scholar
Strambach, S., & Pflitsch, G. (2018). Micro-dynamics in regional transition paths to sustainability – An analysis of organizational and institutional change in Augsburg’s transition topology. Applied Geography, 90, 296–307.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.012
View in Google Scholar
Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations. New York: William Morrow.
View in Google Scholar
Tadić, S., & Veljović M. (2021). Home delivery: A framework for structuring. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 11(1), 30–74.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7708/ijtte.2021.11(1).03
View in Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge. Penguin.
View in Google Scholar
Thompson, C. J., & Kumar, A. (2018). Beyond consumer responsibilization: Slow Food’s actually existing neoliberalism. Journal of Consumer Culture, 21, 317–336.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518818632
View in Google Scholar
Turku, V., Ari, J., & Pekka, J. (2022). How do time-bound practices initiate local sustainability pathways? Sustainable Cities and Society, 79. 103697.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103697
View in Google Scholar
Van Duin, J. H. R., Wiegmans, B. W., Van Arem, B., & Van Amstel, Y. (2020). From home delivery to parcel lockers: A case study in Amsterdam. Transportation Research Procedia, 46, 37–44.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.161
View in Google Scholar
Virglerova, Z., Ivanova, E., Dvorský, J., Belas, J., & Krulický, T. (2021). Selected factors of internationalisation and their impact on the SME perception of the market risk. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(4), 1011–1032.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.033
View in Google Scholar
Visser E. J., & Lanzendorf M. (2004). Mobility and accessibility effects of B2ce‐commerce: A literature review. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, 95(2), 189–205.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0040-747X.2004.00300.x
View in Google Scholar
Welch, D. (2017). Behaviour change and theories of practice: Contributions, limitations and developments. Social Business, 7(3-4), 241–261.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1362/204440817X15108539431488
View in Google Scholar
Welch, D., Swaffield, J., & Evans, D. (2021). Who’s responsible for food waste? Consumers, retailers and the food waste discourse coalition in the United Kingdom. Journal of Consumer Culture, 21, 236–256.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518773801
View in Google Scholar
Wey Smola, K., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363–382.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.147
View in Google Scholar
Wilhelm, W. (2009). The relationship between student knowledge of sustainability concepts and product choice. In G. H. Brodowsky & R. A. Lupton (Eds). MEA 2009 conference proceedings. Newport Beach: Marketing Educators’ Association.
View in Google Scholar
Williams, K. C., & Page, R. A. (2011). Marketing to the generations. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 5(1), 1–17.
View in Google Scholar
Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
