Time stability of the impact of institutions on economic growth and real convergence of the EU countries: implications from the hidden Markov models analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.011Keywords:
catching up, convergence, Bayesian model averaging, hidden Markov models, Viterbi pathAbstract
Research background: It is not straightforward to identify the role of institutions for the economic growth. The possible unknown or uncertain areas refer to nonlinearities, time stability, transmission channels, and institutional complementarities. The research problem tackled in this paper is the analysis of the time stability of the relationship between institutions and economic growth and real economic convergence.
Purpose of the article: The article aims to verify whether the impact of the institutional environment on GDP dynamics was stable over time or diffed in various subperiods. The analysis covers the EU28 countries and the 1995?2019 period.
Methods: We use regression equations with time dummies and interactions to assess the stability of the impact of institutions on economic growth. The analysis is based on the partially overlapping observations. The models are estimated with the use of Blundell and Bond?s GMM system estimator. The results are then averaged with the Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) approach. Structural breaks are identified on the basis of the Hidden Markov Models (HMM).
Findings & value added: The value added of the study is threefold. First, we use the HMM approach to find structural breaks. Second, the BMA method is applied to assess the robustness of the outcomes. Third, we show the potential of HMM in foresighting. The results of regression estimates indicate that good institution reflected in the greater scope of economic freedom and better governance lead to the higher economic growth of the EU countries. However, the impact of institutions on economic growth was not stable over time.
Downloads
References
Abdulahi, M. E., Shub, Y., & Khan, M. A. (2019). Resource rents, economic growth, and the role of institutional quality: a panel threshold analysis. Resources Policy, 61, 293?303. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.011
View in Google Scholar
Agbloyor, E. K., Gyeke-Dako, A., Kuipo, R., & Abor, J. Y. (2016). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in SSA: the role of institutions. Thunderbird International Business Review, 58(5), 479?497. doi: 10.1002/tie.21791.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21791
View in Google Scholar
Ahmad, M., & Hall, S. G. (2017). Economic growth and convergence: do institutional proximity and spillovers matter? Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(6), 1065?1085. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.07.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.07.001
View in Google Scholar
Antczak, E., & Suchecka, J. (2011). Spatial autoregressive panel data models applied to evaluate the levels of sustainable development in European countries. Folia Oeconomica Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, 252, 21?44.
View in Google Scholar
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277?297. doi: 10.2307/2297968.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
View in Google Scholar
Bengoa, M., & Sanchez-Robles, B. (2003). Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and growth: new evidence from Latin America. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 529?545. doi: 10.1016/S0176-2680(03)00011-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(03)00011-9
View in Google Scholar
Bernardelli, M., Próchniak, M., & Witkowski, B. (2017a). Cycle and income-level convergence in the EU countries: an identification of turning points based on the hidden Markov models. Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych SGH, 47, 27?42.
View in Google Scholar
Bernardelli, M., Próchniak, M., & Witkowski, B. (2017b). The application of hidden Markov models to the analysis of real convergence. Dynamic Econometric Models, 17, 59?80. doi: 10.12775/DEM.2017.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/DEM.2017.004
View in Google Scholar
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115?143. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
View in Google Scholar
Bolen, J. B., & Sobel, R. S. (2020). Does balance among areas of institutional quality matter for economic growth? Southern Economic Journal, 86(4), 1418?1445. doi: 10.1002/soej.12428.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12428
View in Google Scholar
Bota-Avram, C., Grosanu, A., Rachisan, P.-R., & Gavriletea, M. D. (2018). The bidirectional causality between country-level governance, economic growth and sustainable development: a cross-country data analysis. Sustainability, 10(502), 1?24. doi: 10.3390/su10020502.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020502
View in Google Scholar
Campos, N. F., Coricelli, F., & Moretti, L. (2019). Institutional integration and economic growth in Europe. Journal of Monetary Economics, 103, 88?104. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.08.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.08.001
View in Google Scholar
Fraser Institute (2020). Economic freedom database. Retrieved from http://www.fraserinstitute.org (17.02.2020).
View in Google Scholar
Heritage Foundation (2020). Index of economic freedom database. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/index/ (18.02.2020).
View in Google Scholar
IMF (2020). World Economic Outlook database, April. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org (5.05.2020).
View in Google Scholar
Kacprzyk, A. (2016). Economic freedom-growth nexus in European Union countries. Applied Economics Letters, 23(7), 494?497. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2015. 1083076.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1083076
View in Google Scholar
Ketterer, T. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). Institutions vs. ?first-nature? geography: what drives economic growth in Europe?s regions? Papers in Regional Science, 97(S1), S25?S62. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12237.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12237
View in Google Scholar
Kim, J.-Y. (2002). Limited information likelihood and Bayesian analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 107(1-2), 175?193. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00119-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00119-1
View in Google Scholar
Leamer, E. (1978). Specification searches. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
View in Google Scholar
Mahjabeen, Shah, S. Z. A., Chughtai, S., & Simonetti, B. (2020). Renewable energy, institutional stability, environment and economic growth nexus of D-8 countries. Energy Strategy Reviews, 29, 1?10. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2020.100484.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100484
View in Google Scholar
Maruta, A. A., Banerjee, R., & Cavoli, T. (2020). Foreign aid, institutional quality and economic growth: evidence from the developing world. Economic Modelling, 89, 444?463. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2019.11.008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.11.008
View in Google Scholar
Mathonnat, C., & Minea, A. (2019). Forms of democracy and economic growth volatility. Economic Modelling, 81, 594?603. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2018.07. 013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.07.013
View in Google Scholar
Ozcan, C. C., Aslan, M., & Nazlioglu, S. (2017). Economic freedom, economic growth and international tourism for post-communist (transition) countries: a panel causality analysis. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XXIV(2,611), 75?98.
View in Google Scholar
Piątek, D., Szarzec, K., & Pilc, M. (2013). Economic freedom, democracy and economic growth: a causal investigation in transition countries. Post-Communist Economies, 25(3), 267?288. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2013.813137.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2013.813137
View in Google Scholar
Procházka, P., & Čermáková, K. (2015). Influence of selected institutional factors on the economic growth: case open markets. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30, 702?709. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01319-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01319-2
View in Google Scholar
Próchniak, M., & Witkowski, B. (2014). The legendary 2% convergence parameter: flexible or fixed? Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych SGH, 34, 227?243.
View in Google Scholar
Rapacki, R. (Ed.) (2019). Diversity of patchwork capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.
View in Google Scholar
Sala-i-Martin, X., Doppelhofer, G., & Miller, R. (2004). Determinants of long-term growth: a Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. American Economic Review, 94(4), 813?835. doi: 10.1257/0002828042002570.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002570
View in Google Scholar
Vojinović, B., Mikac, M., & Oplotnik, Ž.J. (2013). The microeconomics of regional development: measuring convergences of local and regional business cycles. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 11(3), 777?797. doi: 10.4335/11.3.777-797(2013).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4335/11.3.777-797(2013)
View in Google Scholar
World Bank (2020a). Worldwide governance indicators database. Retrieved from http://databank.worldbank.org (16.03.2020).
View in Google Scholar
World Bank (2020b). World development indicators database. Retrieved from http://databank.worldbank.org (18.03.2020).
View in Google Scholar
Zghidi, N., Sghaier, I. M., & Abida, Z. (2016). Does economic freedom enhance the impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth in North African countries? A panel data analysis. African Development Review, 28(1), 64?74. doi: 10.1111/1467-8268.12167.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12167
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
