Inclusiveness as a key determinant of work engagement: evidence from V4 countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.034Keywords:
empowerment, workplace autonomy, organizational learning environment, structural equation modelingAbstract
Research background: There is currently a need for empirical research regarding the validity of specific work environment model elements supported by strong statistical evidence. The amount of research conducted in this field has been particularly limited in Central-Eastern Europe. The desire to fill in these gaps was at least in part responsible for the uniqueness of the research approach and its differences from previous similar studies.
Purpose of the article: The purpose of this study was to examine factors affecting employee engagement and to examine their relationship with each other using Visegrad countries as an example.
Methods: The initial data is taken from the fourth European Company Survey (2019) for management respondents. After data cleaning, the sample sizes for Czechia, Hungary Poland, and Slovakia are N(CZ)=904, N(HU)=682, N(PL)=511, and N(SK)=361, respectively. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), the following five dimensions were identified for this research: (1) inclusiveness, (2) empowerment, (3) work autonomy, (4) organizational learning environment, and (5) work engagement. An analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to determine the links that exist among these dimensions of a constructive work environment.
Findings & value added: The structural model indicates that inclusiveness and empowerment have a significant positive impact on work engagement in all the countries examined. Inclusiveness was the strongest predictor of work engagement, followed by empowerment. Both of the two other predictors in the model (workplace autonomy and organizational learning environment) generally had less or no effect on employee engagement. The present study extends recent literature on work engagement by empirically validating the influence of workplace environment-related factors, as well as providing useful organizational policy recommendations for managers.
Downloads
References
Adamonien?, R., Litavniece, L., Ruibyt?, L., & Viduolien?, E. (2021). Influence of individual and organisational variables on the perception of organisational values. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 13(2), 7?17. doi: 10.2478/emj-2021-0008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2021-0008
View in Google Scholar
Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., Abd Majid, N., Foziah, H., Ismail, I., Al Halbusi, H., & Tehseen, S. (2021). Gain more in-sight from common latent factor in struc-tural equation modeling. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1793(1), 012030. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1793/1/012030.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1793/1/012030
View in Google Scholar
Ahmed, T., Shahid Khan, M., Thitivesa, D., Siraphatthada, Y., & Phumdara, T. (2020). Impact of employees engagement and knowledge sharing on organiza-tional performance: study of HR challenges in COVID-19 pandemic. Human Systems Management, 39(4), 589?601. doi: 10.3233/HSM-201052.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-201052
View in Google Scholar
Alshaabani, A., & Rudnák, I. (2022). Impact of trust on employees? engagement: the mediating role of conflict management climate. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences. Advance online publication. doi: 10.3311/P Pso.18154.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.18154
View in Google Scholar
Andreoni, A., Chang, H. J., & Labrunie, M. (2021). Natura non facit saltus: chal-lenges and opportunities for digital industrialisation across developing coun-tries. European Journal of Development Research, 33(2), 330?370. doi: 10.10 57/s41287-020-00355-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00355-z
View in Google Scholar
Baldoni, J. (2015). Mindful leaders have moxie. Leader to Leader, 2015(75), 31?36. doi: 10.1002/ltl.20163.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.20163
View in Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs.
View in Google Scholar
Blair-Loy, M., & Wharton, A. S. (2002). Employees' use of work-family policies and the workplace social context. Social forces, 80(3), 813?845. doi: 10.1353/s of.2002.0002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0002
View in Google Scholar
Blumberg, P. (1969). Industrial democracy: the sociology of participation. Schocken Books.
View in Google Scholar
Borisov, I., & Vinogradov, S. (2019). The effect of collaboration-oriented manage-rial environment on employee job satisfaction. Journal of Management, 2(35), 5?19.
View in Google Scholar
Brey, P. (1999). Worker autonomy and the drama of digital networks in organiza-tions. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(1), 15?25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006199816737
View in Google Scholar
Burke, W. (1986). Leadership as empowering others. In S. Srivastra (Ed.). Execu-tive power (pp. 51?77). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
View in Google Scholar
Buss, A. R., & Royce, J. R. (1975). Detecting cross-cultural commonalities and differences: intergroup factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 82(1), 128?136. doi: 10.1037/h0076156.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076156
View in Google Scholar
Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employ-ee involvement in creative tasks in the work-place: the mediating role of psy-chological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250?260. doi: 10.108 0/10400419.2010.504654.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
View in Google Scholar
Cheng, B., Wang, M., Moormann, J., Olaniran, B. A., & Chen, N. S. (2012). The effects of organizational learning environment factors on e-learning ac-ceptance. Computers & Education, 58(3), 885?899. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.014
View in Google Scholar
Cheng, H. G., & Phillips, M. R. (2014). Secondary analysis of existing data: oppor-tunities and implementation. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 26(6), 371. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.214171.
View in Google Scholar
Cheng, J. W., Lu, K. M., Chang, Y. Y., & Johnstone, S. (2013). Voice behavior and work engagement: the moderating role of super-visor?attributed motives. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51(1), 81?102. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00030.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00030.x
View in Google Scholar
Cho, E. (2016). Making reliability reliable: a systematic approach to reliability coefficients. Organizational Research Methods, 19(4), 651?682. doi: 10.1177/1 094428116656239.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116656239
View in Google Scholar
Cho, S., & Mor Barak, M. E. (2008). Understanding of diversity and inclusion in a perceived homogeneous culture: a study of organizational commitment and job performance among Korean employees. Administration in Social Work, 32(4), 100?126. doi: 10.1080/03643100802293865.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03643100802293865
View in Google Scholar
Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Vecchione, M., Beierlein, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2014). The cross-national invariance properties of a new scale to measure 19 basic human values: a test across eight countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(5), 764?776. doi: 10.1177/0022022114527348.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114527348
View in Google Scholar
Colbert, A. E., Mount, M. K., Harter, J. K., Witt, L., & Barrick, M. R. (2004). Inter-active effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on work-place deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 599?609. doi: 10.1037 /0021-9010.89.4.599.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.599
View in Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297?334.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
View in Google Scholar
Csath, M. (2021). Sustainability requires balanced economic and social develop-ment: the example of the V4 countries. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 5(1), 5?37. doi: 10.53116/pgaflr.2020.1.1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2020.1.1
View in Google Scholar
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: is the door really open? Academy of management journal, 50(4), 869?884. doi: 10.17015/ejbe.2018.021.03.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
View in Google Scholar
Eguchi, H., Inoue, A., Kachi, Y., & Tsutsumi, A. (2021). Association between adap-tation of management philosophy and mission statement, and work engage-ment among Japanese workers: a 1-year prospective cohort study in a Japa-nese company. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(9), e601?e604. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002303.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002303
View in Google Scholar
Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Pub-lic Health, 58(4), 637?642. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
View in Google Scholar
Engbers, T. A., Thompson, M. F., & Slaper, T. F. (2017). Theory and measurement in social capital research. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 537?558. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1299-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1299-0
View in Google Scholar
Eurofound & Cedefop (2020a). European company survey 2019: workplace prac-tices unlocking employee potential. European company survey 2019 series. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2806/763770.
View in Google Scholar
Eurofound & Cedefop (2020b). European company survey 2019: technical re-port, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
View in Google Scholar
Findler, L., Wind, L. H., & Barak, M. E. M. (2007). The challenge of workforce management in a global society: modeling the relationship between diversity, inclusion, organizational culture, and employee well-being, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Administration in Social Work, 31(3), 63?94. doi: 10.1300/J147v31n03_05.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v31n03_05
View in Google Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing re-search, 18(1), 39?50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
View in Google Scholar
Fotiadis, A., Abdulrahman, K., & Spyridou, A. (2019). The mediating roles of psy-chological autonomy, competence and relatedness on work-life balance and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01267.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01267
View in Google Scholar
Frayne, C. A., & Geringer, J. M. (2000). Self-management training for improving job performance: a field experiment involving salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 361. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.361.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.361
View in Google Scholar
Fürstenberg, N., Alfes, K., & Kearney, E. (2021). How and when paradoxical lead-ership benefits work engagement: the role of goal clarity and work autonomy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94, 672?705. doi: 10.1111/joop.12344.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12344
View in Google Scholar
Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199?223. doi: 10.1023/A:1025007614869.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025007614869
View in Google Scholar
Goswami, S., & Goswami, B. K. (2018). Exploring the relationship between work-force diversity, inclusion and employee engagement. Drishtikon: A Management Journal, 9(1), 65?89.
View in Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic sur-vey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159?170. doi: 10.1037/h0076546.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076546
View in Google Scholar
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106?121. doi:10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
View in Google Scholar
Hanaysha, J. (2016). Testing the effects of employee engagement, work environ-ment, and organizational learning on organizational commitment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 289?297. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016. 07.139.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.139
View in Google Scholar
Hardy, C., & Leiba-O?Sullivan, S. (1998). The power behind empowerment: impli-cations for research and practice. Human Relations, 51(4), 451?483. doi: 001872679805100402.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679805100402
View in Google Scholar
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business out-comes: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268. doi: 10.103 7/0021-9010.87.2.268.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
View in Google Scholar
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277?319. doi: 10.1037/0033?2909.97.3.562.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
View in Google Scholar
Hislop, D., Bosua, R., & Helms, R. (2018). Knowledge management in organiza-tions: a critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hebz/9780198724018.001.0001
View in Google Scholar
Holcomb, B. (2001). Friendly for whose family? In A. Leckey (Ed.). The best busi-ness stories of the year: 2001 edition (pp. 327?335). New York: Pantheon Books.
View in Google Scholar
Holland, P., Cooper, B., & Sheehan, C. (2017). Employee voice, supervisor sup-port, and engagement: the mediating role of trust. Human Resource Management, 56(6), 915?929. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21809.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21809
View in Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance struc-ture analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equa-tion Modeling, 6(1), 1?55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
View in Google Scholar
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: a review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 16(2), 131?152. doi: 10.1177/0022002185016002001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002185016002001
View in Google Scholar
Hulin, C., Netemeyer, R., & Cudeck, R. (2001). Can a reliability coefficient be too high? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(1), 55?58.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1001&2_05
View in Google Scholar
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disen-gagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692?724. doi: 10.5465/256287.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
View in Google Scholar
Kausel, E. E., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Narrow personality traits and organization-al attraction: evidence for the complementary hypothesis. Organizational Be-havior and Human Decision Processes, 114(1), 3?14. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2 010.08.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.002
View in Google Scholar
Kimiloglu, H., Ozturan, M., & Kutlu, B. (2017). Perceptions about and attitude toward the usage of e-learning in corporate training. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 339?349. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.062.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.062
View in Google Scholar
Korsakien?, R., Raišien?, A. G., & Bužavait?, M. (2017). Work engagement of older employees: do employee and work-related factors matter? Economics and Sociology, 10(4), 151?161. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/12
View in Google Scholar
Kowalska, A., Kovarnik, J., Hamplova, E., & Prazak, P. (2018). The selected topics for comparison in Visegrad four countries. Economies, 6(3), 50. doi: 10.339 0/economies6030050.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6030050
View in Google Scholar
Kumar, D. P., & Swetha, G. (2011). A prognostic examination of employee en-gagement from its historical roots. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 2(3), 232. doi: 10.7763/IJTEF.2011.V2.108.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7763/IJTEF.2011.V2.108
View in Google Scholar
Lam, L. W. (2012). Impact of competitiveness on salespeople's commitment and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1328?1334. doi: 10.1016/j. jbusres.2011.10.026.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.026
View in Google Scholar
Lambert, S. J., & Waxman, E. (2005). Organizational stratification: distributing opportunities for work-life balance. In E. Kossek & S. Lambert (Eds). Work and life integration: organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 103?126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
View in Google Scholar
Leach, D. J., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (2003). The effect of empowerment on job knowledge: an empirical test involving operators of complex technology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(1), 27?52. doi: 10.1348/096317903321208871.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903321208871
View in Google Scholar
Lee, J. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement: empirical study of hotel employees and managers. Kansas State University. Retrieved from https://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/13653/JungHoonLe e2012.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Lee, Y. K., Kim, S., Son, M. H., & Kim, M. S. (2015). Linking organizational justice to job performance: Evidence from the restaurant industry in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 20(1), 1527?1544. doi: 10.1080/ 10941665.2015.1016052.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2015.1016052
View in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (2021). The evolutionary dynamics of discursive knowledge: Communication-theoretical perspectives on an empirical philosophy of sci-ence, Springer Nature.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59951-5
View in Google Scholar
Li, M., Liu, W., Han, Y., & Zhang, P. (2016). Linking empowering leadership and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organization-al Change Management, 29(5), 793?803 doi: 10.1108/JOCM-07-2015-0116.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2015-0032
View in Google Scholar
Liu, D., Jiang, K., Shalley, C. E., Keem, S., & Zhou, J. (2016). Motivational mecha-nisms of employee creativity: a meta-analytic examination and theoretical ex-tension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 236?263. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.001
View in Google Scholar
Liu, D., Zhang, S., Wang, L., & Lee, T. W. (2011). The effects of autonomy and empowerment on employee turnover: test of a multilevel model in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1305?1316. doi: 10.1037/a0024518.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024518
View in Google Scholar
Lockwood, N. R. (2006). Talent management: driver for organization success. Research Quarterly, 6(6), 1?13. doi: 10.14738/abr.63.4075.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.63.4075
View in Google Scholar
Lundvall, B. ?. (Ed.) (2010). National systems of innovation: toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 2). Anthem Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843318903
View in Google Scholar
Malhotra, N., & Birks, D. (2018). An applied approach. Marketing research. Geor-gia Institute of Technology: Pearson Education Ltd.
View in Google Scholar
Markowska-Przybyla, U. (2012). Social capital as an elusive factor of socio-economic development. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(3), 93?103.
View in Google Scholar
Markwich, C., & Robertson-Smith, G. (2009). Employee engagement. A review of current thinking. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.
View in Google Scholar
Marquardt, M. J. (2002). Building the learning organization mastering 5 elements for corporate learning. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing, Inc.
View in Google Scholar
Menguc, B., Auh, S., Fisher, M., & Haddad, A. (2013). To be engaged or not to be engaged: the antecedents and consequences of service employee engagement. Journal of business research, 66(11), 2163?2170. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012. 01.007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.01.007
View in Google Scholar
Mor Barak, M. E. (2000). The inclusive workplace: an ecosystems approach to diversity management. Social Work, 45(4), 339?353.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/45.4.339
View in Google Scholar
Morgeson, F. P., Delaney-Klinger, K., & Hemingway, M. A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 399?406. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.399.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.399
View in Google Scholar
Mulligan, R., Ramos, J., Martín, P., & Zornoza, A. (2021). Inspiriting innovation: the effects of leader-member exchange (LMX) on innovative behavior as me-diated by mindfulness and work engagement. Sustainability, 13(10), 5409. doi: 10.3390/su13105409.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105409
View in Google Scholar
Mura, L., Ključnikov, A., Tvaronavičien?, M., & Androniceanu, A. (2017). Devel-opment trends in human resource management in small and medium enter-prises in the Visegrad Group. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 14(7), 105?122. doi: 10.12700/APH.14.7.2017.7.7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.14.7.2017.7.7
View in Google Scholar
Nair, N., & Vohra, N. (2015). Diversity and inclusion at the workplace: a review of research and perspectives. Research and Publication Department, Indian Insti-tute of Management, Working Paper, WP2015-03-34.
View in Google Scholar
Nord, W. R., & Tucker, S. (1987). The organizational dynamics of implementing innovation. Implementing routine and radical innovations. Lexington: Lexing-ton Books.
View in Google Scholar
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1?28 doi: 10.2307/2667029.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2667029
View in Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Com-mon method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. doi: 10.10 37/0021-9010.88.5.879.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
View in Google Scholar
Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., & Kedharnath, U. (2018). Inclusive leader-ship: realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190?203. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002
View in Google Scholar
Randolph, W. A., (1995). Navigating the journey to empowerment. Organization-al Dynamics, 24, 19?32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(95)90014-4
View in Google Scholar
Roberson, Q. M. (2006). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 31(2), 212?236.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104273064
View in Google Scholar
Rodin, J., Rennert, K., Solomon, S. K., Baum, A., & Singer, J. E. (1980). Intrinsic motivation for control: fact or fiction. In Advances in environmental psychol-ogy: Vol. 2. Applications of personal control (pp. 131?148). NJ: Erlbaum Hillsdale.
View in Google Scholar
Salge, C., Glackin, C., & Polani, D. (2014). Empowerment ? an introduction. In M. Prokopenko (Eds.). Guided self-organization: inception. Emergence, complexi-ty and computation (pp. 67?114). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/ 978-3-642-53734-9_4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53734-9_4
View in Google Scholar
Saragih, S. (2015). The effects of job autonomy on work outcomes: self efficacy as an intervening variable. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 4(3), 203?215. doi: 10.21632/irjbs.4.3.203-215.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.4.3.203-215
View in Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71?92. doi: 10.1023/A: 1015630930326.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
View in Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., & Butenko, T. (2014). Values and behavior: validating the refined value theory in Russia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 799?813. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2053C.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2053
View in Google Scholar
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organi-zation. New York: Currency Doubleday.
View in Google Scholar
Shakil, R. M., Memon, M. A., & Ting, H. (2021). Inclusive leadership and innova-tive work behaviour: the mediating role of job autonomy. Quality & Quantity, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01102-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01102-0
View in Google Scholar
Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Van der Heijden, B. I., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organi-zational climate for innovation and organizational performance: the mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67?77. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004
View in Google Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442?1465. doi: 10.2307/256865.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256865
View in Google Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M. (1992). When organizations dare: the dynamics of individual empowerment in the workplace. Document ID 9308456. University of Michi-gan.
View in Google Scholar
Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16(5), 537?549. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0153.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0153
View in Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, J., & Moczulska, M. (2015). The involvement of employees in knowledge management in the light of the research results. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(2), 37?51. doi: 10. 12775/OeC.2015.011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2015.011
View in Google Scholar
Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Weiczorek, S., & Schwartz, S. (2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality & Quantity, 43(4), 599?616. doi: 10.1007/s11135-007-9143-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9143-x
View in Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Tamesue, D., Asahi, K., & Ishikawa, Y. (2015). Grit and work engage-ment: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0137501. doi: 10.1371/j ournal.pone.0137501.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137501
View in Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Upper Sad-dle River, NJ: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
View in Google Scholar
Tang, N., Wang, Y., & Zhang, K. (2017). Values of Chinese generation cohorts: do they matter in the workplace? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143, 8?22. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.007
View in Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, A. S. (1986). Back to basics: beyond perception. In R. N. Stern & S. McCarthy (Eds.). International yearbook of organizational democracy for the study of participation, co-operation, and power: Volume III, The organiza-tional practice of democracy (pp. 323?331). New York: John Wiley.
View in Google Scholar
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: an ?interpretive? model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666?681. doi: 10.5465/amr.1990.4310926.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310926
View in Google Scholar
van Tuin, L., Schaufeli, W. B., Van den Broeck, A., & van Rhenen, W. (2020). A corporate purpose as an antecedent to employee motivation and work en-gagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 572343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572 343.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572343
View in Google Scholar
Vogt, P. (1997). Transfer to power. Credit Union Management, 20(6), 44?45.
View in Google Scholar
Wang, X., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2007). Influence of demographic factors and ownership type upon organizational learning culture in Chinese enterprises. International Journal of Training and Development, 11(3), 154?165. doi: 10.11 11/j.1468-2419.2007.00278.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2007.00278.x
View in Google Scholar
Watkins, K., & Marsick, V. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
View in Google Scholar
Weiss, M., & Zacher, H. (2022). Why and when does voice lead to increased job engagement? The role of perceived voice appreciation and emotional stability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 132, 103662. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103662.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103662
View in Google Scholar
Xu, J., & Cooper-Thomas, H. D. (2011). How can leaders achieve high employee engagement? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32(4), 399?416. doi: 10.1108/01437731111134661.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111134661
View in Google Scholar
Yazdani, B. O., Yaghoubi, N. M., & Giri, E. S. P. (2011). Factors affecting the em-powerment of employees. European Journal of Social Sciences, 20(2), 267? 274.
View in Google Scholar
Zhu, W., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2009). Moderating role of follower characteristics with transformational leadership and follower work engage-ment. Group & Organization Management, 34(5), 590?619. doi: 10.1177/10596011 08331242.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108331242
View in Google Scholar
